The Dem left’s firing squad

Let me get this straight:

For 60 years, since Harry Truman, liberal Democrats have supported a national health insurance system — so that the health of individual Americans and families would not be a function of wealth.

Now, in December 2009, we Democrats have a progressive president and substantial majorities in both houses of Congress and finally have a chance to get to 60 votes, and perhaps more, in the Senate with legislation that would:

1) Guarantee access to private insurance policies for virtually every American (at least, well above 90 percent) — including providing tax subsidies to some 30 million people who earn too much to qualify for Medicaid and too little to be able to afford to purchase health insurance;

2) By virtually requiring everyone to “pay or play” — thus broadening the base of the insurance pool to include the young and healthy as well as the old and infirm — require every insurance company to provide health insurance coverage, regardless of the health or status of the applicant — regardless of pre-existing condition, regardless of a chronic disease, regardless of age or infirmity;

3) Provide a transparent state-regulated public marketplace, where insurance companies would have to sell their insurance and allow consumers to compare prices and encourage competing companies to sharpen their pencils in order to increase their sales; and

4) Do all this and still, according to the Congressional Budget Office, reduce the deficit after 10 years.

And yet, people who call themselves “liberals” or “progressives” are actually calling for the bill to be defeated, for President Barack ObamaBarack Hussein ObamaTrump's tariffs are a case of crony capitalism Obama to visit Kenya, South Africa for Obama Foundation in July Overnight Energy: EPA declines to write new rule for toxic spills | Senate blocks move to stop Obama water rule | EPA bought 'tactical' pants and polos MORE to be opposed?

Is there anyone among them who is uninsured who would oppose this bill? Anyone who depends on public hospital emergency rooms for healthcare when one of their children is sick? Anyone who is unemployed with a pre-existing condition, who lost their insurance and can’t get any company to cover their families? Anyone who is scared to death that, without health insurance, they are one serious illness away, for themselves or their families, from bankruptcy and ruin?

I doubt it.

President Obama and his brilliant and politically savvy chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, began at the beginning with the following simple strategy: Let’s get the fundamentals passed — and the above four components are clearly the fundamentals. Let’s try for more, including a broad public option, and push the edge of the envelope to get it all.

We see the hateful, suicidal impulses of the Democratic hard left in the scapegoating of Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.). First we have vicious personal attacks on him when he expressed doubts about the new idea of a Medicare buy-in for those ages 55-64 — and hypocritical silence when, a few days later, numerous liberal Democratic senators, such as Wisconsin’s Russ Feingold, Minnesota’s Al FrankenAlan (Al) Stuart FrankenThe Hill's Morning Report — Sponsored by PhRMA — GOP lawmakers race to find an immigration fix Richard Painter puts out 'dumpster fire' in first campaign ad Bill Clinton says 'norms have changed' in society for what 'you can do to somebody against their will' MORE and Amy KlobucharAmy Jean KlobucharDem senators introduce bill to ban controversial voter purges Democrats protest Trump's immigration policy from Senate floor The Hill's Morning Report — Sponsored by PhRMA — GOP lawmakers race to find an immigration fix MORE and Vermont’s Patrick LeahyPatrick Joseph LeahyOvernight Defense: Defense spending bill amendments target hot-button issues | Space Force already facing hurdles | Senators voice 'deep' concerns at using military lawyers on immigration cases Senators 'deeply troubled' military lawyers being used for immigration cases Overnight Energy: EPA declines to write new rule for toxic spills | Senate blocks move to stop Obama water rule | EPA bought 'tactical' pants and polos MORE, express concerns about the proposal and its failure to provide for adequate reimbursement rates. Then we hear from the notorious Jane Hamsher — the same Hamsher who used the universally condemned racist “blackface” photo of Lieberman on her blog in 2006 when she was opposing his reelection — we hear Hamsher demanding that Sen. Lieberman’s wife, Hadassah, be fired from her position as global ambassador for the Susan G. Komen for the Cure breast cancer charity. The reason: because Hamsher accused her of being a lobbyist who in years past had worked for the pharmaceutical industry.

(Not that facts matter to Hamsher, but Mrs. Lieberman has never been a lobbyist, she worked for pharmaceutical companies years ago, and only someone who thinks like Joe McCarthy would deem it appropriate to attack Mrs. Lieberman even if both were true.)

It’s time for mainstream liberal Democrats to join with the party’s moderates and the great center of America — the center-left that elected Obama president and to which he has consistently appealed as president — in support of the current national health insurance bill with these four components that can win 60 votes in the Senate.

And it’s time for the party’s mainstream to call out the hateful left — and affirm the values of liberalism, not the philosophy that “the good is the enemy of the perfect” and the demonization and impugning of the motives of those fellow Democrats with whom there are honest differences.

Davis, a Washington lawyer and former special counsel to President Clinton from 1996-98, served as a member of President George W. Bush’s Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board in 2005-06. He is the author of Scandal: How ‘Gotcha’ Politics is Destroying America.