THE HILL
 

Conservative cowards

By Markos Moulitsas - 11/17/09 05:25 PM ET

American liberals are tough on terrorists and secure in their knowledge that the Sept. 11 conspirators are guilty of mass murder. American conservatives are timid cowards who fear that the U.S. government can’t actually prove that the Sept. 11 killers committed their heinous crimes. Sound weird?

Maybe. But what else can be concluded after watching conservatives collectively lose their heads over President Barack Obama’s easy decision to try Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four other co-conspirators in U.S. District Court in New York City? Seems that macho conservatives are terrified of shackled terrorists in orange jumpsuits and the United States Constitution.

“This decision is further evidence that the White House is reverting to a dangerous pre-Sept. 11 mentality: treating terrorism as a law enforcement issue and hoping for the best,” wailed House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio), panic-stricken that the federal criminal justice system wasn’t up to the task of protecting him.

Conservative hack Bill Kristol of the Weekly Standard fretted: “In open court, it will be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed who will hold forth, mocking his victims, exulting in the suffering of their families, ridiculing the judge, his lawyers and the American justice system, and worst of all, rallying his jihadi brothers to kill more Americans … just blocks from where 20,000 body parts were dug out of the rubble of the Twin Towers.”

Kristol’s words were as inflammatory as they were cowardly, betraying a sad fear that the pathetic Mohammed could shout out, “Allahu akbar!” in a courtroom and … what? Generate sensationalistic headlines in the New York Post? Immediately convert millions of Americans into radical Islamic extremists? Give slacking terrorists new resolve to attack America?

Fact is, there are 216 international terrorists currently serving time in U.S. prisons, all of them tried and convicted in U.S. criminal courts, including Sept. 11 co-conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui (tried in a federal court by the George W. Bush administration).

So why change now? Because conservatives are terrified of what terrorists might do? Well, the point of “terrorism” is to instill terror. Apparently, in the case of terrified conservatives, it’s mission accomplished.

Republicans have incessantly told us that terrorists hate America because of its freedoms. So there is no better way to show terrorists they’ve failed than to defiantly frog-march their comrades through the streets of Manhattan, like common criminals, showcasing the American Constitution and the freedoms they supposedly hate so much.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg, like most New Yorkers, appears eager to mete out justice, saying, “It is fitting that Sept. 11 suspects face justice near the World Trade Center site where so many New Yorkers were murdered.” But fear has infected cowering conservatives outside New York.

Illinois Rep. and Senate hopeful Mark Kirk (R) has decried a plan to bring the Guantánamo detainees to a near-empty prison in rural Thomson, Ill. “As home to America’s tallest building,” Kirk proclaimed, “we should not invite al Qaeda to make Illinois its No. 1 target.” Rep. Don Manzullo (R), who represents Thomson, followed suit: “Guantánamo is separated [from] the rest of the world by oceans. But not Thomson. There’s just cornfields around it.”

Yet while Republican politicians tremble, Thomson residents refuse to cower. If a terrorist were to escape from the prison? “I’ve got plenty of weapons and ammunition at my house,” said 62-year-old Dave Lawton to the AP.

“Kirk’s scare talk might do him wonders with the GOP base, but it won’t convince a single terrorist that this nation has a backbone,” editorialized the Chicago Sun-Times about Kirk, but they may as well have been talking about the entire Republican Party.

Moulitsas is founder and publisher of Daily Kos (www.dailykos.com).

Source:
http://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/markos-moulitas/68189-conservative-cowards

Comments (51)

The current administration could institute a regressive or flat tax, mandate gun ownership for every adult citizen, eliminate health care and education benefits, disband the IRS, make abortion and homosexuality crimes and start 2 more wars and the NeoCons would still by crying. It isn't about ideals or mores or positions for them anymore. It's a contest, and they're still sore (losers) from losing the "big game" in Nov, '08. No matter what the Obama administration does, the party of "WAAAHH!" will try to stop it, make it fail or delay it. No matter the consequences to America or Americans; as long as it hurts the Dems, it's green lit. This is but one more example of them stirring the fear pot to illicit an emotional response and eschewing any sense of basic logic or reason.BY NetWorker on 11/17/2009 at 20:51
This is an absurd article that just demonstrates how correct fiscal and foreign policy conservatives are on how insane and awful this administration and their "progressives" tyrants are. We are making real progress at discrediting them when they start writing nonesense like this.BY Andrew on 11/17/2009 at 21:36
Uh—- yeah. 'Cause this article had ANYthing to do with fiscal policy. Andrew, how are you discrediting progressives by being a wimp, saying that we don't have the balls to try these guys in NYC so that New Yorkers can stare them in the face and send them off to be slaughtered and sent straight to [***]? Why is the far right so afraid of everything?BY Tony on 11/17/2009 at 22:03
Then let the left put their money where their mouth is. If they are going to be treated as common criminals, charge KSM and the 9/11 conspirators with Hate Crimes. Or is it just easier to call people names when they don't agree with you? Go back to your little cult/blog and stay there…BY wytshus on 11/17/2009 at 22:11
Typical of the Republican "leadership" in Illinois. We're at war against terrorists, but these chicken hawks don't want to lift a finger. Mark Kirk is a naval reservist, and that's great. But even he's never really been in harm's way. Very, very few other Republican officials in Illinois have ever even worn the uniform. Now they don't even want to help house the terrorist suspects the real heros do catch.News flash pinheads: Islamic extremists already hate us, for a lot of reasons. They hate our culture, our wealth, our freedom. Good going Illinois GOP, by your cowardice and wimpiness, you show weakness, and that puts us all more at risk.BY Embarrassed tobe GOP on 11/17/2009 at 22:51
Liberal punks who dig threw peoples past to smear and call perverted names like racism and teabagger at anyone who thinks this government is a giant, wasteful tyrant sucking the lifeblood of freedom need to lean some manners and respect. At some point you are going to come up against people that are fed up with your inability to reason your positions.BY tex on 11/18/2009 at 00:13
But as you so eloquently point out, Tex, "that day", very obviously is not today.BY Tony on 11/18/2009 at 01:17
Kos I've been with you from the beginning but your writing is starting to stink. You need to tighten your logic and themes a bit. Overblown, empty rhetoric is not going to get us far.BY HONEST ABE on 11/18/2009 at 02:10
Well, one Republican candidate for U. S. Senator does favor bringing the terrorist to Illinois. People in Western Illinois are not afraid, and they know how to handle any escapees.Please do not put me in the same place as Mark Kirk.Andy MartinRepublica n for U. S. Senatorwww.AndyforUSSenato r.comBY Andy Martin on 11/18/2009 at 11:57
Dems say "po-ta-to" then Reps say "po-tah-to." I'm surprised that anyone blogging here takes all this posturing seriously.BY Mike P. on 11/18/2009 at 11:59

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.