By Lowell Bruce Laingen, former chargé d’affaires at the U.S. Embassy in Tehran - 02/05/13 11:52 PM EST
In the wake of your Senate confirmation as secretary of State, I write to offer my congratulations and wish you well on your tenure. Having followed your career for some years, I have no doubt you will serve our nation with dignity and honor.
As a 40-year veteran of the Foreign Service, I was encouraged to hear you praise the men and women who serve our nation overseas. I thank you for your passion, your words, and your recognition of the “sacrifices and commitment the men and women of the Foreign Service make every day on behalf of America.” I also thank you for condemning Iran for recently imprisoning an American citizen, Saeed Abedini, a Christian pastor who was sentenced this week to eight years in prison for evangelizing in the Islamic Republic.
At your hearing, you said that you “condemn Iran’s continued violation of the universal right of freedom of religion and call on the Iranian authorities to respect Mr. Abedini’s human rights and release him.”
As one of the Americans held hostage in Tehran for 444 days from 1979-1981, I deeply respect those sentiments and we acutely understand the impact of the violation of human rights on people. I — along with 52 others — made a supreme sacrifice. We were physically abused and subjected to mock executions and unspeakable acts of violence and terror. Many in our 53, indeed, never made it home whole. There has been alcoholism, divorce and suicide among not only the hostages but their family members, who endured 444 days of abject intense fear where death came with every unlocked cell or knock on the door. Through it all, our commitment — to our nation, to our post, to our values, to each other — never wavered.
At your confirmation hearing, you said, “I wish everyone in the country could see and understand firsthand the devotion, loyalty and amazingly hard, often dangerous work that our diplomats on the front lines do. There is service which earns our country an enormous return on our investment. I will be proud and honored to represent them and I will work hard to augment our public diplomacy so that the story is told at home and abroad.”
For more than three long decades, my colleagues and I have sought justice for the extensive physical trauma and mental anguish we faced during our very difficult imprisonment. We seek accountability. We seek the rights granted to every other group of victims of state-sponsored terrorism.
You wish all Americans could see and understand firsthand the devotion, loyalty and amazingly hard, often dangerous work of our nation’s diplomats. I implore you to give meaning to these words by supporting those who have endured — and continue to endure — so much. Tell our story. Recognize our sacrifice. Remember our commitment.
From Lowell Bruce Laingen, former chargé d’affaires at the U.S. Embassy in Tehran and the senior American official held hostage during the Iranian hostage crisis, Washington, D.C.
Our forefathers got it right on electoral vote
I find the proposals to base Virginia’s electoral vote on individual congressional districts, and to reapportion them more along party lines, ironic given the GOP championship of the state. Our Founding Fathers chose THAT entity for representation — not too big, not too small — for a reason: to avoid mob rule. Valuing election choices by district, if visualized as just a bit larger than tiny towns, brings into focus just how easily distortion in the election process can occur, particularly in rural areas, due to local, face-to-face social pressure, real or imagined.
A nationwide popular vote would dilute the framers’ intent in the opposite direction, with the added modern concern of the reach of technology, which has substantially shrunk the world.
Perhaps our leaders should take a step back into time to acquaint themselves with history and appreciate, rather than make a farce of, our forefathers’ logic ... because they got it right.
From Karen Ann DeLuca, Alexandria, Va.
Birthright citizenship ought to be abolished
The Senate’s top-ranking Democratic leaders, Sens. Dick DurbinDick DurbinDems gain upper hand on budget McConnell: Senate could drop flood money from spending bill Funding bill rejected as shutdown nears MORE (Ill.) and Charles SchumerCharles SchumerDemocrats press Wells Fargo CEO for more answers on scandal 78 lawmakers vote to sustain Obama veto 3 ways the next president can succeed on immigration reform MORE (N.Y.), and the Senate’s two leading Republican authorities on immigration reform, Sens. Marco RubioMarco RubioLanny Davis: Clinton a clear winner, with or without sound Could Snapchat be the digital bridge to younger voters? Koch-linked veterans group launches ads in Senate battlegrounds MORE (Fla.) and John McCainJohn McCainOvernight Defense: Congress overrides Obama 9/11 veto | Pentagon breathes easy after funding deal | More troops heading to Iraq McCain comments won't derail Bergdahl case Senators already eyeing changes to 9/11 bill after veto override MORE (Ariz.), are talking about big immigration reform.
But the media is not asking this question: Is part of this immigration reform going to include doing away with birthright citizenship, and will it be a top priority?
This has been a plague to this country since slavery was abolished, costing taxpayers billions of dollars. This is a question that many people would like an answer to.
From Larry Hattis, Odenville, Ala.