Equal justice under law for fathers

I applaud Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and her colleagues on the United States Supreme Court for seeking gender equality in citizenship law (“Supreme Court strikes down gender-based citizenship law,” June 12, 2017).

Engraved above the public entrance to the United States Supreme Court are the words: “Equal Justice Under Law.” 

All fathers are entitled to equal justice under law in all of the nation’s courts — including family courts.

Can the nation now move on to adoption law, where birth mothers and birth fathers are treated totally differently based solely on their gender and which often leads to heartbreaking legal cases and a lose-lose-lose situation for all members of the adoptive triad —birth parents, adoptive parents and the child? In the future, gender equality and equal justice under law along with the best interests of the child must jointly prevail in adoption law.

This decision is a step in the right direction and comes just in time for Fathers Day!

From Gordon E. Finley, Ph.D., Miami, Fla.

Lynch should be compelled to testify before Congress

Where is the mainstream new media’s moral rectitude with this latest disclosure involving Loretta Lynch’s 2016 attempt to influence the presidential election by interfering with the FBI’s active investigation of Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonO’Malley tells Dems not to fear Trump FBI informant gathered years of evidence on Russian push for US nuclear fuel deals, including Uranium One, memos show Pelosi blasts California Republicans for supporting tax bill MORE?

We have Lynch’s influencing Comey in her mandate that he characterize the Clinton “investigation” as only a “matter.” And, of course, the infamous Lynch-Bill ClintonBill ClintonBill Clinton distributes relief supplies in Puerto Rico In Washington and Hollywood, principle is sad matter of timing Mika Brzezinski: Bill Clinton needs to apologize or stop talking MORE mysterious chat in that airplane on the tarmac of Phoenix’s Sky Harbor Airport whereby the alleged import of their “little confab” focused on “the kids.”

And, moving onward with this saga, Clinton’s July Fourth weekend, Saturday morning, token “kid-glove” excuse of a criminal interrogatory session with FBI officials.

Lastly, only to be exceeded by Comey’s reprehensible July 5 press conference whereby he declared Clinton guilty, but-not-guilty of mishandling classified and top-secret information relating to the national interests of the United States.

On this basis, and without question, Loretta Lynch likewise must be ordered to appear before Congress to explain her Clinton-related actions to interfere with this FBI investigation in the same manner as the Democrats have forced Attorney General Jeff SessionsJefferson (Jeff) Beauregard SessionsFederal judge rules Trump defunding sanctuary cities 'unconstitutional on its face' FBI informant gathered years of evidence on Russian push for US nuclear fuel deals, including Uranium One, memos show Alabama election has GOP racing against the clock MORE to appear before the Senate Intelligence Committee over this alleged Russia affair.

From Earl Beal, Terre Haute, Ind.

Kamala Harris’s poor conduct

I watched both of the hearings on TV, and Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) was just flat-out rude. She didn’t allow anyone to answer her questions. She reminded me of some snotty reporter who was trying to get them to say what she wanted to hear. In other words, she was trying to manipulate them.

She would not allow them to answer her questions the way they wanted to answer them.

She needs to dial it down a notch and understand these men are not on trial and they are not criminals. They are government servants and leaders — they deserve respect.

Many people would describe Harris using the “B” word: “belligerent.”

From William Berberich, Fairfield Bay, Ark.