Law enforcement mobilizes behind encryption bill

Law enforcement mobilizes behind encryption bill
© Getty Images

Major law enforcement organizations are lining up to support a controversial bill that would give investigators greater access to encrypted data.

In the past few days, prominent police commissioners, district attorneys and the industry groups that represent them have pressed Congress to move on a bill that would force companies to provide “technical assistance” to government investigators seeking secure data.

“The legislation provides the necessary lawful access by law enforcement and prosecutors to critical digital evidence that has become more and more of an integral part in today’s investigations in the field,” said a joint letter from the National District Attorneys Association and the International Association of Chiefs of Police.

The measure, from Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard BurrRichard Mauze BurrOvernight Finance: Senate rejects Trump immigration plan | U.S. Bancorp to pay 0M in fines for lacking money laundering protections | Cryptocurrency market overcharges users | Prudential fights to loosen oversight Senators introduce bill to help businesses with trade complaints Our intelligence chiefs just want to tell the truth about national security MORE (R-N.C.) and ranking member Dianne FeinsteinDianne Emiel FeinsteinLawmakers feel pressure on guns Feinstein: Trump must urge GOP to pass bump stock ban Florida lawmakers reject motion to consider bill that would ban assault rifles MORE (D-Calif.), is a response to law enforcement concerns that criminals are increasingly using encrypted technology to hide from authorities.

The two lawmakers released an official discussion draft of their legislation last week.

While law enforcement has long pressed Congress for such a bill, the technology community and privacy advocates caution that guaranteeing access to secure data will undermine security and endanger online privacy.

Sen. Ron WydenRonald (Ron) Lee WydenOvernight Health Care: Trump eases rules on insurance outside ObamaCare | HHS office on religious rights gets 300 complaints in a month | GOP chair eyes opioid bill vote by Memorial Day Trump eases rules on insurance sold outside of ObamaCare Grassley, Dems step up battle over judicial nominees MORE (D-Ore.), a tech-focused privacy advocate, has already vowed to filibuster the bill over these concerns.

But leading law enforcement officials are using their sway to try to get the measure passed.

They say companies are failing to comply with legal court orders and impeding legitimate investigations.

For instance, Apple recently defied an FBI court order directing it to help unlock an iPhone used by one of the San Bernardino shooters. The government only dropped its request after discovering a way to bypass the phone's security without Apple's assistance.

Police officials around the country have hundreds of seized phones that they cannot access because tech companies refuse to help.

“Law enforcement cannot do this alone,” said New York City Police Commissioner William Bratton. “I have long sought legislation that would compel application developers and phone manufacturers to adhere with orders from a court.”

The recent terror attacks in Paris, San Bernardino, Calif., and Brussels have led to increased calls for congressional action. Lawmakers say they believe encryption helped the attackers evade authorities in each incident, though little evidence has been presented to back up the claims.

“As terrorist acts rock Europe, law enforcement’s ability to legally intercept communication is critical to uncovering the next plot,” Bratton said. “No key piece of evidence in disrupting an attack or identifying a child predator should be beyond the reach of the law.”

Also supporting the bill is Cyrus Vance, the outspoken district attorney for New York County.

“For the past year and a half, Apple and other large technology companies have effectively decided who can and cannot access crucial evidence in criminal investigations,” he said in a recent statement. “In the absence of legislation to address the seismic impact of warrant-proof encryption on public safety, they have rendered themselves — not judges — gatekeepers of critical information necessary to solving crimes on behalf of victims across the nation.”

The FBI Agents Association, Major Cities Police Chiefs Association, and Major County Sheriffs' Association have also expressed support.

— Updated 3:42 p.m.