Dem candidates back Obama on Iraq

Dem candidates back Obama on Iraq
© File photos/Getty

Democrats in tough Senate election fights aren’t running away from the White House on Iraq — at least not yet.

While many of the candidates have sought to distance themselves from President Obama on a host of issues, they have offered measured support for his escalating campaign of airstrikes in Iraq.

ADVERTISEMENT
“I think that the president is taking the right course to use air power to hold off these militant groups and to try to re-establish order,” Sen. Mary LandrieuMary LandrieuProject Veritas at risk of losing fundraising license in New York, AG warns You want to recall John McCain? Good luck, it will be impossible CNN producer on new O'Keefe video: Voters are 'stupid,' Trump is 'crazy' MORE (D-La.) said in a local TV interview.

Alison Lundergan Grimes, the Democrat hoping to unseat Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellGOP strategist donates to Alabama Democrat McConnell names Senate GOP tax conferees Brent Budowsky: A plea to Alabama voters MORE (Ky.), thinks “limited air strikes for humanitarian reasons and in support of our allies against terrorists are appropriate,” according to a campaign aide.

Other Democrats are hedging their support.

Sen. Mark PryorMark PryorMedicaid rollback looms for GOP senators in 2020 Cotton pitches anti-Democrat message to SC delegation Ex-Sen. Kay Hagan joins lobby firm MORE (D-Ark.), who along with Landrieu is considered one of the most vulnerable Senate Democrats running for reelection, said airstrikes “provide short-term relief,” but warned a long-term solution must come from the Iraqi people.

"I don't think most Arkansans believe that we should be the world's policeman," Pryor said this week, according to The Baxter Bulletin.

“We need to work with our allies. We need to try to help and provide a stable situation, and certainly look out for the humanitarian concerns, but at the end of the day, a lot of these countries, they just have to take responsibility for their own countries,” he said.

Iraq hasn’t been a hot topic on the campaign trail, though that could change in the weeks ahead.

Democratic candidates have generally offered support for airstrikes but warned against putting ground troops in Iraq. Those opinions track well with polling that shows the public is wary of another entanglement in the Middle East.

A Washington Post/ABC News poll released this week found 54 percent of Americans backed the airstrikes against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), while 39 percent opposed them.

A Pew Research poll produced similar numbers, with a majority of respondents also expressing concern that the U.S. could get bogged down in another long and costly conflict in the Middle East.

Republicans, for their part, have heavily criticized Obama’s leadership on foreign policy, as they aim to make the midterm elections a referendum on the relatively unpopular president.

A handful of members from both parties have argued that Congress should take action on Iraq when lawmakers return in September, though a vote so close to the election seems highly unlikely.

Rep. Bruce BraleyBruce Lowell BraleyOPINION | Tax reform, not Trump-McConnell feuds, will make 2018 a win for GOP Ten years later, House Dems reunite and look forward Trump: Ernst wanted 'more seasoning' before entertaining VP offer MORE (D-Iowa), who is trying to retain Sen. Tom HarkinTom HarkinDemocrats are all talk when it comes to DC statehood The Hill's 12:30 Report Distance education: Tumultuous today and yesterday MORE’s seat for Democrats, sent a letter last week to Defense Secretary Chuck HagelCharles (Chuck) Timothy HagelPentagon documents hundreds of serious misconduct cases against top brass Obama defense sec: Trump's treatment of Gold Star families 'sickens' me The Hill's 12:30 Report MORE requesting specifics on the deployment of military personnel to Iraq, noting one of his “primary concerns” was that Obama “had not sought congressional approval.”

But most Democrats in tough races are avoiding the issue of a vote in Congress, which political analysts say is a smart strategy.

Even if it is a way to show distance from the president, there’s little reason for candidates to stake out their positions before November, says Kyle Kondik of the University of Virginia's Center for Politics.

“The generic Democratic playbook in all of these states is that the Republican candidate is too extreme in some way,” he said. “How does an Iraq airstrike vote play into that strategy at all?”

“If they thought it was good to be talking about, they’d be talking about it,” Kondik said.

Press offices for Landrieu and Pryor didn’t return repeated requests for comment about whether Congress should have a vote on Iraq. Senate candidate Michelle Nunn, who hopes to pull off an upset for Democrats in Georgia, also did not respond to requests for comment.

Spokesmen for Sens. Kay HaganKay HaganPolitics is purple in North Carolina Democrats can win North Carolina just like Jimmy Carter did in 1976 North Carolina will be a big battleground state in 2020 MORE (D-N.C.) and Mark BegichMark Peter BegichPerez creates advisory team for DNC transition The future of the Arctic 2016’s battle for the Senate: A shifting map MORE (D-Alaska) both passed along statements about Iraq that did not directly address whether Congress should hold a vote on the use of military force.