Siawash told the Bee that Afghanistan would fall back to the 1990s without a sound government in place “when we had civil war and the Talibanization of the country.”
While President Obama has said most U.S. troops will be gone when the transition occurs in 2014, a timeline has not been established for getting out the 68,000 troops that will be there in the fall.
Obama signed a 10-year strategic partnership agreement with Afghan President Hamid Karzai that would establish a U.S. presence in Afghanistan through 2024, which was designed in part to send a signal to the Taliban and Haqqani Network that the United States would not abandon Afghanistan.
Fatema Aziz, one of two female legislators in the group,
said that the Pakistan Taliban appeared to be making a comeback.
“They're making life miserable,” she said. “The Taliban's taking young Afghan boys to Pakistan's madrassas.”
Michael O’Hanlon, a defense analyst at the Brookings Institution, said at a House hearing on Afghanistan last week that the 2014 elections are going to be crucial for the future of the country.
“I talked to a top Afghan general when I was visiting last month and we asked him, ‘What's your No. 1 concern about security in Afghanistan?’ ” O’Hanlon said. “And he said, ‘The 2014 election, because we get the wrong person elected and all bets are off.’ ”
The Afghan legislators, who met with Sen. John McCainJohn McCainMcCain having 'conversations' with Dems on Gorsuch nomination McCain responds to North Korean criticism to calling Kim Jong-un 'crazy fat kid' Overnight Finance: Dems seek probe of acting SEC chief | Defense hawks say they won't back short-term funding | Senate seen as start point for Trump infrastructure plan | Dems want more money for IRS MORE (R-Ariz.) last week, said they were concerned about the centralized government and corruption.
“I told Sen. McCain, 'You're wasting your time and your money. Why don't you hold the Afghan government accountable and put an end to the corruption?’ ” Siawash told the Bee.