Florida, Colorado take on Kansas in fight over $427M Air Force contract

Lawmakers from three states are in a high-stakes fight over a $427 million Air Force contract to build light planes for the Afghan military.

The fight pits Brazil’s Embraer, Sierra Nevada Corp. and lawmakers from Florida and Colorado, where the 20 planes are now set to be built, against the Kansas delegation and losing bidder Beechcraft, an aerospace firm based in Wichita, Kan. At stake are about 1,400 jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT
Beechcraft and the Kansas lawmakers say the company’s bid was cheaper and that the Air Force is siding with a foreign company over a U.S. defense firm. Beechcraft filed a protest of the bid with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), which is now reviewing it. It has also launched a federal lawsuit seeking to undo the contract.

“When it comes to producing aircraft that will help Americans come home from Afghanistan, the U.S. Air Force today concluded that America’s 'best interest' now rests on the shoulders of Brazil,” Beechcraft said in a statement earlier this month.

Embraer and Sierra Nevada say that the foreign preference argument from Beechcraft is nonsense, because the planes will be built at a new Embraer plant in Jacksonville, Fla. The avionics package would be constructed at Sierra Nevada's Centennial, Colo., facility.

Sens. Pat RobertsCharles (Pat) Patrick RobertsGOP senators raise concerns about babies on Senate floor Senate passes resolution allowing Duckworth to bring baby on floor Kill off anti-environmental excesses in the farm bill MORE (R-Kan.) and Jerry MoranGerald (Jerry) MoranTrump VA pick faces challenge to convince senators he’s ready for job Overnight Finance: Senate repeals auto-lending guidance, shattering precedent with vote | House passes IRS reform bills | Senate GOP fears tax cut sequel Senate repeals auto-loan guidance in precedent-shattering vote MORE (R-Kan.) and Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-Kan.) have written Defense Secretary Chuck HagelCharles (Chuck) Timothy HagelShould Mike Pompeo be confirmed? Intel chief: Federal debt poses 'dire threat' to national security Hagel: Trump is 'an embarrassment' MORE two letters this month over the contract.

In the first, they asked for a “thorough, compelling explanation” for the decision, arguing that the consequences of the award to the U.S. industrial base were “staggering.”

“While the U.S. aviation manufacturing industry continues to recover, now is the time to invest in U.S. jobs and manufacturing and not abroad,” the Kansas lawmakers wrote.

Four Florida lawmakers, Sens. Marco RubioMarco Antonio RubioStudents gather outside White House after walkout to protest gun violence Overnight Energy: Senate confirms Bridenstine as NASA chief | Watchdog probes Pruitt’s use of security detail | Emails shine light on EPA science policy changes Senate confirms Trump’s pick to lead NASA MORE (R-Fla.) and Bill NelsonClarence (Bill) William NelsonOvernight Energy: Senate confirms Bridenstine as NASA chief | Watchdog probes Pruitt’s use of security detail | Emails shine light on EPA science policy changes Scott ramps up spending to million in Florida Senate race Overnight Energy: Trump NASA pick advances after drama | White House office to investigate Pruitt's soundproof booth | 170 lawmakers call for Pruitt to resign MORE (D-Fla.) and Reps. Ander Crenshaw (R-Fla.) and Corrine BrownCorrine BrownFormer Florida rep sentenced to five years in prison for fraud, tax evasion Genuine veteran charities face a challenge beating the fakes Former Florida rep found guilty of tax evasion, fraud MORE (D-Fla.), responded that it was important to provide Afghanistan with the light air support aircraft “without delay.”

“We know that you understand the urgency of this situation and we applaud the determination of the Air Force to move forward with this program despite numerous delays,” the lawmakers wrote to Hagel. “Please know that we stand ready to assist in any manner to ensure that these aircraft reach our warfighters and partners on the ground in Afghanistan without delay.”

A second round of letters was sparked after the Air Force lifted a Stop Work Order due to the review, which prompted Embraer to sign a lease on a new Jacksonville, Fla., assembly facility.

Beechcraft filed a lawsuit in the Court of Federal Claims to contest the Air Force’s decision, and the Kansas delegation urged Hagel to “personally reevaluate this decision and reinstate the Stop Work Order.”

“To proceed with a contract that may not stand up before the GAO is a waste of taxpayer dollars and an affront to good governance,” the Kansas lawmakers said.

This time, the delegation from Colorado, one of the states where Sierra Nevada has facilities, responded with a letter to Hagel sent on Monday.

“It is our strong opinion that the Air Force’s decision to select the SNC/Embraer team was well founded and should be upheld without additional delays,” wrote Sens. Mark UdallMark Emery UdallSenate GOP rejects Trump’s call to go big on gun legislation Democratic primary could upend bid for Colorado seat Picking 2018 candidates pits McConnell vs. GOP groups MORE (D-Colo.) and Michael BennetMichael Farrand BennetOvernight Health Care: GOP pushes stiff work requirements for food stamps | Johnny Isakson opens up about family's tragic loss to opioids | Republicans refuse to back vulnerable Dem's opioids bill | Dems offer new public option plan Lawmakers discuss Latino education gap The Hill's Morning Report: Hannity drawn into Cohen legal fight MORE (D-Colo.) and Rep. Mike Coffman (R-Colo.).

This is the second time Beechcraft has protested the contract being awarded to Sierra Nevada and Embraer.

The Air Force canceled the first winning bid last year after Beechcraft said it was unfairly disqualified. The Air Force decided it had documentation problems with the contract and required both companies to make new bids.

Embraer’s A-29 Super Tucano was chosen again last month over Beechcraft’s AT-6.

The politics surrounding the contract award go beyond U.S. soil, too. Brazil is in the process of selecting a contractor for a multibillion-dollar fighter contract in which U.S.-based Boeing is one of the finalists.

Brazil’s president raised the contract dispute last year with President Obama during a visit to the White House.

The stakes are also high for Beechcraft, which was formerly Hawker Beechcraft before recently emerging from bankruptcy.

“I think what makes this relatively small program a lightning rod is the fact that if Beechcraft loses, it could be the end of the road for the company,” said Loren Thompson, a defense analyst at the Lexington Institute who consults for several defense firms.

“Beechcraft is one of the few surviving aircraft companies in Wichita, which used to be one of the world’s largest concentrations of aircraft technologies.”