Joint Chiefs to testify on sexual assault legislation

Several high-profile incidents in recent months coupled with a Pentagon report estimating the number of assaults in 2012 had risen by a third has sparked momentum in Congress to change the military judicial code.

ADVERTISEMENT
The two bills that have generated the most debate surround the military's chain of command.

Sen. Kirsten GillibrandKirsten Elizabeth GillibrandOvernight Defense: Senate passes 0B defense bill | 3,000 US troops heading to Afghanistan | Two more Navy officials fired over ship collisions Overnight Cybersecurity: Equifax hit by earlier hack | What to know about Kaspersky controversy | Officials review EU-US privacy pact Senate passes 0B defense bill MORE (D-N.Y.) has proposed legislation that would take the decision to prosecute felony-level cases outside of the chain of command and give it to military prosecutors. She says her bill will encourage sexual assault victims to report the crimes.

Rep. Jackie Speier (R-Calif.) has legislation that would create an independent office to investigate and prosecute sexual assault crimes.

Opponents of the measures say that the commander is responsible for life and death decisions for his troops and must retain the ability to choose to punish them in order to maintain good order and discipline. 

So far, Defense Secretary Chuck HagelCharles (Chuck) Timothy HagelThe Hill's 12:30 Report The Hill's 12:30 Report Billionaires stopping climate change action have a hold on Trump, GOP MORE and Dempsey have said they are open to all proposals and are not weighing in on specific legislation, although Hagel had expressed support for the chain of command before Gillibrand’s bill was released.

Senate Armed Services Chairman Carl LevinCarl LevinPresident Trump, listen to candidate Trump and keep Volcker Rule Republicans can learn from John McCain’s heroism Trump and GOP wise to keep tax reform and infrastructure separate MORE (D-Mich.) and ranking member James InhofeJames (Jim) Mountain InhofeA third of Congress hasn’t held a town hall — it’s time to take action Anonymous affiliate publishes claimed list of GOP private contact info Wasting America’s nuclear opportunity MORE (R-Okla.) sent a letter to Dempsey last week asking him to weigh in on the various legislation.

The Armed Services panels are considering the various pieces of sexual assault legislation to include as part of the annual Defense authorization bill.

The military has already backed one reform to the Uniform Code of Military Justice that is included in a number of lawmakers’ bills. The measures would strip military commanders’ ability to overturn a jury’s guilty verdict in a post-trial review, a change that has been proposed in response to an Air Force sexual assault case earlier this year.

The hearing will also give the military a chance to discuss a number other provisions that have been proposed in roughly a dozen bills. Those range from granting victims whistleblower protections to transferring service members accused of assault out of units to requiring dismissal for those convicted of sexual assault or rape.