Sen. Rand PaulRand PaulSenate takes up NATO membership for Montenegro Overnight Defense: Civilian casualties raise questions about rules of engagement | Air Force nominee set for hearing | Senate takes up NATO membership for Montenegro Feehery: Freedom Caucus follies MORE (R-Ky.) on Wednesday warned against U.S. military involvement in Syria's civil war, arguing that the conflict has “no clear national security connection to the United States.”
"The war in Syria has no clear national security connection to the United States and victory by either side will not necessarily bring in to power people friendly to the United States,” Paul said.
The Kentucky senator and possible 2016 GOP presidential candidate also expressed skepticism toward the administration’s view that it was “undeniable” Assad’s forces had used chemical weapons, saying that the United States should “ascertain who used the weapons.”
Paul’s statement comes as the administration is gearing up for a potential military strike against Syrian President Bashar Assad’s government, which is accused of using chemical weapons in an attack last week that left hundreds dead.
His opposition to U.S. strikes highlights the divisions within the Republican Party over how to respond to the possible use of chemical weapons in Syria.
GOP defense hawks like Sen. John McCainJohn McCainSenate takes up NATO membership for Montenegro A great military requires greater spending than Trump has proposed Cheney: Russian election interference could be ‘act of war’ MORE (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey GrahamLindsey GrahamSenate takes up NATO membership for Montenegro Republicans giving Univision the cold shoulder: report Graham: 'I'm glad' Ivanka will be working in the White House MORE (R-S.C.) have pushed the administration to go further than the limited strikes currently being considered.
Paul has frequently clashed with McCain and other Republican hawks on foreign policy and national security issues, including suspending aid to Egypt and the use of lethal drones.
In his statement Wednesday, Paul sided with nearly 100 House members — including more than a dozen Democrats — who argue that President Obama would violate the Constitution if he does not get authorization from Congress before launching a military strike in Syria.
“The Constitution grants the power to declare war to Congress, not the president,” Paul said.