By Carlo Muñoz - 09/03/13 06:19 PM EDT
Flake would not say outright that the White House misstepped by delaying strikes to secure congressional approval, but he noted "it seems a bit of a strange way to go about it."
On Sunday, President Obama announced the White House would delay proposed military strikes against the Syrian government in order to seek congressional authorization for the operation.
Obama stated he was prepared to conduct strikes in Syria, without U.S. lawmakers' blessing, in retaliation for Assad's use of chemical weapons.
But seeking official authorization from Congress could unify the country behind any effort to strike the Syrian government, the president noted.
That said, Flake said he had serious concerns over why the administration opted to hold off on military action in Syria.
"I think all of us recognize that it is a bit of a strange situation when you come to Congress to [seek] authorization for action you can already take," Flake told reporters on Capitol Hill Tuesday.
"There are a lot of questions as to why we waited" to take action in the country, he said.
The biggest concern, according to Flake, is efforts Assad's forces are reportedly taking in anticipation of an American attack.
Obama has stated the delay to seek authorization from Congress will not affect U.S. plans.
Planned U.S. operations against Syria "will be effective tomorrow, or next week, or one month from now, and I am prepared to give that order," the president said.
Flake openly questioned that assertion, saying the fluidity of the Syrian civil war could nullify the White House's battle plans.
"It would seem strange that you would have the same targets available a couple of weeks later," Flake said.
Assad is reportedly moving prisoners taken by his forces to military sites across the country that could be targeted by U.S. missiles.
Syrian troops have already abandoned positions in the capital of Damascus, retreating to underground bunkers and military compounds north of the city.
But Flake was quick to point out that his support for early action in Syria was not an endorsement of full-scale U.S. operations in the country.
The Obama administration has said "again, again and again that this is not Iraq, this is not Afghanistan, this is not even Libya," he said.
The White House has expressed openness to rewriting draft language authorizing the use of force in Syria to win votes.
Secretary of Defense Chuck HagelChuck HagelThere's still time for another third-party option Hagel says NATO deployment could spark a new Cold War with Russia Overnight Defense: House panel unveils 5B defense spending bill MORE, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey and Secretary of State John KerryJohn KerryCutting corners in a federal campaign is criminal Navy investigation concludes Iran broke international law by detaining sailors Top Democrat wants Obama to block Boeing's deal with Iran MORE came to Capitol Hill on Tuesday to lay out the administration's war plans.
House Speaker John BoehnerJohn BoehnerEXCLUSIVE: Pro-Hillary group takes 0K in banned donations Ryan: Benghazi report shows administration's failures Clinton can't escape Benghazi responsibility MORE (R-Ohio) and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) have said they will back military action in Syria when the authorization vote comes to the House floor.