Obama's request to strike Syria passes first test in Senate

A Senate panel voted 10-7 Wednesday in favor of a resolution authorizing military force against Syria, setting up a final Senate vote as early as next week. [WATCH VIDEO]

Seven Democrats and three Republicans backed the measure, while five Republicans and two Democrats on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee opposed it.

Chairman Robert MenendezRobert MenendezGMO labeling bill advances in the Senate over Dem objections Overnight Finance: Trump threatens NAFTA withdrawal | Senate poised for crucial Puerto Rico vote | Ryan calls for UK trade deal | Senate Dems block Zika funding deal Menendez rails against Puerto Rico bill for 4 hours on floor MORE (D-N.J.) said the measure would be sent to Senate Majority Leader Harry ReidHarry ReidDem ad blasts Indiana senate candidate on Social Security Super-PAC targets Portman on trade Dem leader urges compromise on FCC set-top box plan MORE (D-Nev.) on Monday.

ADVERTISEMENT
Approval by the panel was expected, but the tight vote suggests a final vote in the Senate could be close. Earlier this year, the panel had voted 15-3 to arm Syrian rebels.

Menendez and Sens. John McCainJohn McCainSyria activists cheer Kaine pick Clinton brings in the heavy hitters Guess which Cuban-American 2016 candidate best set themselves up for 2020? MORE (R-Ariz.), Barbara BoxerBarbara BoxerDem suggests race factored into Obama Senate endorsement Obama, Biden back Kamala Harris in Calif. Senate race Tim Scott says he was targeted by Capitol Police MORE (D-Calif.) Ben CardinBen CardinDemocratic National Convention event calendar Bernie’s ‘revolution’ marches to Philly Senate Dems introduce Iran sanctions extension MORE (D-Md.), Jeanne Shaheen Jeanne ShaheenDemocrats ‘freaked out’ about polls in meeting with Clinton GMO labeling bill advances in the Senate over Dem objections Overnight Defense: US blames ISIS for Turkey attack | Afghan visas in spending bill | Army rolls up its sleeves MORE (D-N.H.), Chris CoonsChris CoonsSenators ask IRS to issue guidance to help startups Senate Dems push Obama for more Iran transparency Overnight Tech: First on The Hill – Key senators team up against robocalls | Social media giants back revenge porn bill | Facebook's diversity numbers MORE (D-Del.), Dick DurbinDick DurbinSyria activists cheer Kaine pick Democratic National Convention event calendar Opioid package clears key Senate hurdle MORE (D-Ill.), Tim KaineTim KaineTrump: Warren's 'got a fresh mouth' Chamber of Commerce's top lobbyist retiring RNC chief raises idea that Dem delegates be allowed to vote their conscience MORE (D-Va.), Bob CorkerBob CorkerTrump starts considering Cabinet Trump's secret weapon is Ivanka Senate Dems introduce Iran sanctions extension MORE (R-Tenn.) and Jeff FlakeJeff FlakeVulnerable GOP senators praise Kaine GOP Sen. Flake offers Trump rare praise Booker denounces ‘lock her up' chants MORE (R-Ariz.) voted in favor of the resolution.

Sens. Tom UdallTom UdallDemocratic National Convention event calendar The Hill's 12:30 Report Overnight Energy: Senate spending bill takes aim at EPA rules MORE (D-N.M.), Rand PaulRand PaulWhat to watch for on Day 2 at the GOP convention Cyber squatters sitting on valuable VP web addresses Majority of GOP senators to attend Trump convention MORE (R-Ky.), Marco RubioMarco RubioClinton brings in the heavy hitters Guess which Cuban-American 2016 candidate best set themselves up for 2020? Budowsky: Why Warren masters Trump MORE (R-Fla.), John BarrassoJohn BarrassoGoonies, Pokemon and ‘transsexual shake’ speak to raucous scene at convention GOP passes rules vote over outcry from Trump opponents Overnight Healthcare: Feds defend ObamaCare's affordability MORE (R-Wyo.), Ron JohnsonRon JohnsonGreens launch M ad buy in Wis. Senate race The Trail 2016: Putting the past behind them GOP groups scale back support for Sen. Johnson MORE (R-Wis.), James Risch (R-Idaho) and Sen. Chris MurphyChris MurphyWeek ahead in health: All eyes turn to Dem convention Overnight Healthcare: Mysterious new Zika case | Mental health bill in doubt | Teletraining to fight opioids Hopes dim for mental health deal MORE (D-Conn.) voted against it, while Sen. Ed MarkeyEd MarkeyFCC chief pushes phone companies to offer free robocall blocking Markey floats bill bringing internet to developing world Overnight Tech: First on The Hill – Key senators team up against robocalls | Social media giants back revenge porn bill | Facebook's diversity numbers MORE (D-Mass.) voted present.

The Senate is seen as the easier chamber for President Obama to win authorization for a military strike against Syria.

In the House, he appears to face deeper rank-and-file opposition, and at a House hearing on Wednesday many more lawmakers voiced opposition to a strike than supported one.

Before its final vote, the Senate panel accepted an amendment drafted by McCain and Coons that specified that the goal of U.S. military intervention in Syria should be to bolster the Free Syrian Army.

McCain had warned earlier that he could oppose a resolution that did not put an emphasis on ending the rule of Syrian President Bashar Assad.

The resolution also states that the aim of U.S. strikes should be to reduce Assad’s ability to use chemical weapons.

Menendez indicated he had been under pressure to create a resolution that did not get the U.S. into a broader mission in Syria, but that did ensure Assad would not use chemical weapons again.

Menendez argued the panel’s final product “struck the right balance” between those goals.

Durbin, the second-ranking Democrat in the Senate, said the measure “narrowly defined” what the U.S. could do in Syria militarily. An initial resolution sent to Capitol Hill by the Obama administration was criticized by Democrats for being far too broad.

Coons argued the risk of doing nothing in Syria outweighed the risk that the U.S. would wind up getting further drawn into the conflict.

Assad “will use these weapons again, and we will be less safe,” he said.

Udall, however, said Wednesday's vote put the nation on the wrong path. He argued the risk of an escalation was too great for the U.S. to get involved.

McCain, in contrast, chastised some colleagues for “micromanaging” the White House's battle plans.

“We cannot tell the president what tactics to employ” on the battlefield, McCain said.

One amendment rejected by the panel, which was offered by Udall, would have only allowed U.S. naval forces to be used in an attack against Syria.

The New Mexico Democrat also proposed language blocking American warplanes from entering Syrian airspace.

“If we go down this road, we are going to be running the [operation] from here,” McCain said.

— This story was posted at 3:44 p.m. and updated at 5:07 p.m.