Forbes and other members of the House Armed Services Committee have "one frightening hearing after another" with top service brass on sequestration's impact to U.S. defense priorities, according to Forbes.
That said, House lawmakers outside the defense panel, "have voted to cut hundreds of billions of dollars from defense without fully understanding the impacts," Forbes said in a statement to The Hill Wednesday.
GOP committee members Joe WilsonJoe WilsonA guide to the committees: House Overnight Cybersecurity: Flynn fallout | Trump, Trudeau pledge cyber cooperation | Dems want detals on Trump's phone Four areas Republicans have moved to uproot Obama’s legacy MORE (S.C.), Michael Turner (Ohio), Rob WittmanRob WittmanA guide to the committees: House Five races to watch in 2017 VA Dems jockey for Kaine's seat MORE (Va.), Mike Rogers (Ala.) and Duncan Hunter (Calif.) were part of the 14 other House Republicans who co-signed Forbes' letter to leadership.
"If the raw facts about the imminent and dangerous fissures in our nation’s ability to protect its citizens did not create pause in Members of Congress, I’m not sure what would," Forbes added Wednesday.
As a result, Forbes is asking Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey, Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ray Odierno, Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jonathan Greenert, Marine Corps Commandant Gen. James Amos and Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Welsh to lay out, in detail, sequestration's impact to House members in a classified setting.
That briefing could include how the U.S. military would meet regional threats like China, Iran and North Korea, along with continuing counterterrorism missions in Africa and the Middle East under sequestration.
"We believe it is critical that the current state of our military readiness be understood by the entirety of the House of Representatives," as the House GOP continues to square off against the White House over the ongoing shutdown and looming debt ceiling dead line.
Under sequestration, the Pentagon is staring down $500 billion in mandatory spending cuts. The cuts began in March and would reduce Pentagon spending by $52 billion next year.
In a new strategy released in July, Defense Secretary Chuck HagelChuck HagelWho will temper Trump after he takes office? Hagel: I’m ‘encouraged’ by Trump’s Russia outreach Want to 'drain the swamp'? Implement regular order MORE said the department is considering shrinking the Army from 490,00 to between 380,000 and 450,000 troops.
The Marine Corps would be slashed from 182,000 to between 150,00 to 175,000, and the number of aircraft carrier strike groups would be reduced from 11 to eight or nine, under that plan.
Another scenario outlined in that sequestration strategy would keep current troop numbers, but abandon vital weapons programs designed to replace several aging systems in the Pentagon’s arsenal, Hagel said at the time.