By Andrew Restuccia - 02/24/11 07:52 PM EST
Feinberg, a Washington lawyer who previously administered the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund, and his law firm negotiated a contract with BP to be paid $850,000 a month for overseeing the Gulf Coast Claims Facility, which doles out compensation to victims of the oil spill. That salary comes up for review every three months, Vitter said.
“It would be like a judge not only being paid by one of the parties to a lawsuit before that judge, but having the judge’s salary subject to a negotiation between the judge and that party every three months at exactly the same time as that judge hears and decides the case,” Vitter said in the letter.
He also said the $850,000 a month salary “seems staggering, particularly in that it's not tied in any way to any certain number of hours worked by any certain number of people.”
Vitter proposed two “constructive suggestions” for fixing what he called a conflict of interest. First, an independent party, not BP or Feinberg, should decide on Feinberg’s compensation. Second, Vitter asked to see an itemized list of the hours Feinberg and staff at his law firm worked on the claims process."
Here is the full letter:
February 24, 2011
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL AND OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUESTED
Managing Partner, Feinberg Rozen, LLP
1455 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20004
Chairman and President BP America, Inc.
501 Westlake Park Court
Houston, TX 77079
I write to express my strong objection to Mr. Feinberg's compensation arrangement with BP and to suggest a better alternative.
As I understand it, BP has agreed to pay Mr. Feinberg and his firm $850,000 per month for claims administration from funds BP has set aside internally for claims-related matters. However, this amount comes up for reconsideration/renegotiation every three months.
First, I think it is a clear and profound conflict of interest for Mr. Feinberg to be regularly negotiating his compensation with BP at the same time as he is deciding BP's liability to Louisiana claimants and others. This conflict is completely unacceptable.
It would be like a judge not only being paid by one of the parties to a lawsuit before that judge, but having the judge’s salary subject to a negotiation between the judge and that party every three months at exactly the same time as that judge hears and decides the case.
Would you want to be that other party to the case? That's the position Louisiana claimants and others are in.
Second, an 850,000 per month flat fee seems staggering, particularly in that it's not tied in any way to any certain number of hours worked by any certain number of people. Given this arrangement, it does not surprise me when inquiries and other matters are not adequately dealt with by the Feinberg firm but instead fall through the cracks.
To correct all this, I have two constructive suggestions.
First, these serious problems including the fundamental conflict of interest would largely be avoided if Mr. Feinberg and BP agreed on a qualified arbitrator and charged her with setting the compensation of the Feinberg firm at the end of each month. Compensation would be based on hours billed for specific, itemized tasks outlined on hourly billing sheets at reasonable hourly rates, with some appropriate overall cap (different rates for different personnel involved--Mr. Feinberg, other attorneys, paralegals, other staff, etc). I ask you to adopt this arrangement and agree on a qualified arbitrator.
Second and as background, I would like to see a time/billing report for personnel at the Feinberg firm and their work on claims matters during January 2011. I would also like to know what each individual's normal hourly billing rate is to non-BP corporate clients.
I think all of these points and requests are very reasonable. They go to the fundamental question of fairness to Louisiana claimants and others, particularly in light of other calls on BP resources (like Feinberg pay).
I look forward to your responses to these points as soon as you can provide them. Thank you.
David VitterDavid VitterHonor Frank Lautenberg by protecting our kids Cruz: VA secretary 'should resign' Senate’s first female combat vet: VA secretary must resign MORE
United States Senator
Cc: President Barack ObamaBarack ObamaRyan seeks to put stamp on GOP in Trump era Stoddard: Clouds loom for Clinton Pelosi, Dems rush to defense of Wasserman Schultz MORE
Admiral Robert J. Papp
Senator Mary Landreiu
Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison
Senator John CornynJohn CornynSenate GOP ties Iran sanctions fight to defense bill Senate votes to block financial adviser rule GOP mired in Zika dispute MORE
Senator Thad CochranThad CochranSenate votes to block USDA catfish inspections GOP senators: Obama bathroom guidance is 'not appropriate' First US Zika death reported in Puerto Rico MORE
Senator Roger WickerRoger WickerSenate votes to block USDA catfish inspections GOP senators: Obama bathroom guidance is 'not appropriate' Senate Republicans ask Trump to soften his tone MORE
Senator Jeff SessionsJeff SessionsPatients dying because of FDA inflexibility Sessions: Clinton is the most anti-Second Amendment candidate ever Sunday shows preview: Sanders opens up about battle with Clinton MORE
Senator Richard Shelby
Senator Bill NelsonBill NelsonSenators to House: FAA reauthorization would enhance airport security Dems discuss dropping Wasserman Schultz Grassley worried about FCC box proposal MORE
Senator Marco RubioMarco RubioSenate GOP ties Iran sanctions fight to defense bill Analysis: Pa. senator missed most Budget Committee hearings Susana Martinez fires back at Trump MORE
Senator Barbara BoxerBarbara BoxerThe Hill's 12:30 Report Sen. Boxer fires back at Sanders aide: 'He wasn't there' Sanders aide questions Boxer's story about fearing for her safety MORE
Senator James InhofeJames InhofeGOP senators propose sending ISIS fighters to Gitmo Overnight Defense: VA chief 'deeply' regrets Disney remark; Senate fight brews over Gitmo Senate GOP gears up for fight over Gitmo transfers MORE
Congressman John Mica
Congressman Nick RahallNick RahallWest Virginia is no longer Clinton country Solution needed: Rail congestion is stifling economic growth Lobbying World MORE, II