Feinberg, a Washington lawyer who previously administered the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund, and his law firm negotiated a contract with BP to be paid $850,000 a month for overseeing the Gulf Coast Claims Facility, which doles out compensation to victims of the oil spill. That salary comes up for review every three months, Vitter said.
“It would be like a judge not only being paid by one of the parties to a lawsuit before that judge, but having the judge’s salary subject to a negotiation between the judge and that party every three months at exactly the same time as that judge hears and decides the case,” Vitter said in the letter.
He also said the $850,000 a month salary “seems staggering, particularly in that it's not tied in any way to any certain number of hours worked by any certain number of people.”
Vitter proposed two “constructive suggestions” for fixing what he called a conflict of interest. First, an independent party, not BP or Feinberg, should decide on Feinberg’s compensation. Second, Vitter asked to see an itemized list of the hours Feinberg and staff at his law firm worked on the claims process."
Here is the full letter:
February 24, 2011
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL AND OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUESTED
Managing Partner, Feinberg Rozen, LLP
1455 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20004
Chairman and President BP America, Inc.
501 Westlake Park Court
Houston, TX 77079
I write to express my strong objection to Mr. Feinberg's compensation arrangement with BP and to suggest a better alternative.
As I understand it, BP has agreed to pay Mr. Feinberg and his firm $850,000 per month for claims administration from funds BP has set aside internally for claims-related matters. However, this amount comes up for reconsideration/renegotiation every three months.
First, I think it is a clear and profound conflict of interest for Mr. Feinberg to be regularly negotiating his compensation with BP at the same time as he is deciding BP's liability to Louisiana claimants and others. This conflict is completely unacceptable.
It would be like a judge not only being paid by one of the parties to a lawsuit before that judge, but having the judge’s salary subject to a negotiation between the judge and that party every three months at exactly the same time as that judge hears and decides the case.
Would you want to be that other party to the case? That's the position Louisiana claimants and others are in.
Second, an 850,000 per month flat fee seems staggering, particularly in that it's not tied in any way to any certain number of hours worked by any certain number of people. Given this arrangement, it does not surprise me when inquiries and other matters are not adequately dealt with by the Feinberg firm but instead fall through the cracks.
To correct all this, I have two constructive suggestions.
First, these serious problems including the fundamental conflict of interest would largely be avoided if Mr. Feinberg and BP agreed on a qualified arbitrator and charged her with setting the compensation of the Feinberg firm at the end of each month. Compensation would be based on hours billed for specific, itemized tasks outlined on hourly billing sheets at reasonable hourly rates, with some appropriate overall cap (different rates for different personnel involved--Mr. Feinberg, other attorneys, paralegals, other staff, etc). I ask you to adopt this arrangement and agree on a qualified arbitrator.
Second and as background, I would like to see a time/billing report for personnel at the Feinberg firm and their work on claims matters during January 2011. I would also like to know what each individual's normal hourly billing rate is to non-BP corporate clients.
I think all of these points and requests are very reasonable. They go to the fundamental question of fairness to Louisiana claimants and others, particularly in light of other calls on BP resources (like Feinberg pay).
I look forward to your responses to these points as soon as you can provide them. Thank you.
David VitterDavid VitterMercury brings on former Sen. Vitter, two others Lobbying World Bottom Line MORE
United States Senator
Cc: President Barack ObamaBarack ObamaPriebus, Wallace clash over media coverage of Trump Rand Paul: We’re very lucky John McCain’s not in charge Limbaugh: 'The media did not make Donald Trump and they can't destroy him' MORE
Admiral Robert J. Papp
Senator Mary Landreiu
Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison
Senator John CornynJohn CornynComey meets Intel senators amid uproar over Trump-Russia ties Corker: Senate GOP discussing best path for Russia probe Senate GOP leaders urge WH to withdraw Puzder nomination: report MORE
Senator Thad CochranThad CochranMulvaney sworn in as White House budget chief Senate confirms Mulvaney to be Trump’s budget chief McCain announces opposition to Trump's pick for budget chief MORE
Senator Roger WickerRoger WickerPrice huddles with Senate GOP on ObamaCare Net neutrality fix faces hard sell Lawmakers push FCC chief to boost rural broadband MORE
Senator Jeff SessionsJeff SessionsWhere Trump’s travel ban stands Top antitrust senators call for Sessions to scrutinize AT&T-Time Warner merger Dems doubt Trump will show 'heart' toward immigrant kids MORE
Senator Richard Shelby
Senator Bill NelsonBill NelsonSenate advances Trump's Commerce pick CMS nominee breezes through confirmation hearing Net neutrality fix faces hard sell MORE
Senator Marco RubioMarco RubioTop Dem: GOP is terrified of Trump McConnell on Trump: 'I'm not a fan of the daily tweets' Senate Intel head in the dark about Trump intelligence review MORE
Senator Barbara BoxerBarbara BoxerCarly Fiorina 'certainly looking at' Virginia Senate run Top Obama adviser signs with Hollywood talent agency: report Democrats vie for chance to take on Trump as California governor MORE
Senator James InhofeJames InhofeGOP considers ways to ‘modernize’ endangered species law GOP bill would eliminate Consumer Financial Protection Bureau GOP senators to Trump: We support 'maintaining and expanding' Gitmo MORE
Congressman John Mica
Congressman Nick RahallNick RahallWest Virginia is no longer Clinton country Solution needed: Rail congestion is stifling economic growth Lobbying World MORE, II