Dems hope deficit is trump card in fight over oil industry tax breaks

Leading Senate Democrats have coalesced around a political strategy in their uphill battle to repeal billions of dollars in oil industry tax breaks: Make it all about the deficit.

Caucus leaders and several politically vulnerable members unveiled legislation Tuesday that would repeal $21 billion worth of tax breaks over a decade for the largest oil companies.

ADVERTISEMENT
All the savings would be steered toward deficit reduction, which Democrats made their top talking point as they baited GOP foes on nixing the incentives.

“If you are serious about deficit reduction and you say Big Oil’s tax breaks are off limits, how serious can you be?” said Sen. Charles SchumerCharles (Chuck) Ellis SchumerCan Mueller be more honest than his colleagues? Throwing some cold water on all of the Korean summit optimism House Republicans push Mulvaney, Trump to rescind Gateway funds MORE (N.Y.), a key strategist for Senate Democrats.

Senate Majority Leader Harry ReidHarry Mason ReidAfter Dems stood against Pompeo, Senate’s confirmation process needs a revamp GOP poised to advance rules change to speed up Trump nominees Dems walk tightrope on Pompeo nomination MORE (D-Nev.) vowed to open floor debate this week and said he’s eyeing a vote “in the next week.”

Democrats facing tough reelection battles next year — such as Sens. Claire McCaskillClaire Conner McCaskillRand's reversal advances Pompeo Pompeo headed for confirmation after surprise panel vote Donnelly becomes third Dem to support Pompeo MORE (Mo.) and Sherrod BrownSherrod Campbell BrownVulnerable Senate Dems have big cash advantages Trump VA pick faces challenge to convince senators he’s ready for job Overnight Finance: Senate repeals auto-lending guidance, shattering precedent with vote | House passes IRS reform bills | Senate GOP fears tax cut sequel MORE (Ohio) — hewed to a line similar to Schumer’s at a press conference announcing the bill.

“If we can’t remove subsidies from these profitable big oil companies, then I don’t know if we can ever get to the really difficult work that lies ahead,” McCaskill said. “This ought to be the essence of low-hanging fruit.”

Other lead sponsors include Sens. Jon TesterJonathan (Jon) TesterNew allegations could threaten Trump VA pick: reports Overnight Health Care: Teen pregnancy program to focus on abstinence | Insurers warn against short-term health plan proposal | Trump VA pick faces tough sell Vulnerable Senate Dems have big cash advantages MORE (D-Mont.), who is also politically vulnerable in next year’s election, and Robert MenendezRobert (Bob) MenendezSenate must save itself by confirming Mike Pompeo Poll: Menendez has 17-point lead over GOP challenger Russian attacks on America require bipartisan response from Congress MORE (D-N.J.).

A White House spokesman praised the bill. 

“The president has been clear that we need to end unwarranted tax breaks for oil and gas companies. The bottom line is that there are more responsible ways to spend billions in taxpayer dollars than handing them out to oil and gas companies that just posted huge profits. We consider this bill an important step,” spokesman Clark Stevens said.

The Democrats’ strategy could also be a way to pressure Republicans into supporting the legislation, because it addresses two top issues among voters — anger at oil companies over gas prices and the federal deficit.

Still, the strategy isn’t a sure thing. It is drawing attacks from Republicans as well as Democrats who support the oil industry.

The opposition highlights the difficulty of making the measure something other than a political messaging vehicle amid high gas prices and flush industry coffers. Recent Senate efforts to nix oil industry incentives fell well short last February and in June 2010.

Sen. John CornynJohn CornynRand's reversal advances Pompeo Joe Scarborough predicts Trump won't run in 2020 Republicans divided over legislation protecting Mueller MORE (Texas), chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, told reporters Tuesday that the plans would harm domestic oil producers at consumers’ expense.

“It doesn’t apply to state-owned oil companies from Saudi Arabia or China or around the world, and it disadvantages domestic producers, and of course they can’t absorb those taxes; they get passed along to consumers,” he said.

Sen. Mary LandrieuMary Loretta LandrieuSenate GOP rejects Trump’s call to go big on gun legislation Project Veritas at risk of losing fundraising license in New York, AG warns You want to recall John McCain? Good luck, it will be impossible MORE (D-La.), a strong ally of her home state’s oil industry, also criticized the plan and said she would not vote for it “under any circumstance.”

The Democrats’ bill would seek to end several deductions for a handful of major oil companies such as Exxon, Chevron and BP.

It ends their ability to claim a deduction on domestic manufacturing and production income, and prevents expensing of so-called intangible drilling costs, among other provisions.

Andrew Restuccia contributed reporting.