Senate Dems use GOP ethanol votes to push for tax revenues in deficit deal

Several Senate Democrats are using GOP support for killing ethanol subsidies as a political weapon against Republican leaders’ resistance to including increased tax revenues in a broad deficit-cutting deal.

Thirty-four Senate Republicans — including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnellMitch McConnellProgressive group changes tone on Kaine Trump hits Kaine on TPP: He supports a 'job killer' Clinton maps out first 100 days MORE (R-Ky.) — this month voted to quickly end the multibillion-dollar ethanol blenders’ credit, albeit as part of economic development legislation that was subsequently derailed.

ADVERTISEMENT
Sen. Charles SchumerCharles SchumerThe Trail 2016: Unity at last This week: Congress eyes the exits in dash to recess Former Gillibrand aide wins NY House primary MORE (D-N.Y.), a top strategist for Senate Democrats, on Wednesday said this should open the door for ending tax breaks as part of the high-stakes deal that the White House and lawmakers are negotiating around raising the debt ceiling.

“It makes no sense for Leader McConnell to, on the one hand, say that he agrees that ethanol subsidies are wasteful but then say — just to stick to ideological, way-out-there principle that we can’t eliminate that subsidy in the debt-limit deal,” said Schumer, the chairman of the Senate Democratic Policy Committee, at a press conference in the Capitol.

Democrats are calling for several revenue measures in the deficit deal, including repeal of billions of dollars' worth of oil industry tax breaks.

“If you begin to look at ethanol and you begin to look at oil subsidies, you can see a way in which you begin to ultimately end the tax breaks that Americans shouldn’t bear any more and that we can put toward deficit reduction,” said Sen. Robert MenendezRobert MenendezGMO labeling bill advances in the Senate over Dem objections Overnight Finance: Trump threatens NAFTA withdrawal | Senate poised for crucial Puerto Rico vote | Ryan calls for UK trade deal | Senate Dems block Zika funding deal Menendez rails against Puerto Rico bill for 4 hours on floor MORE (D-N.J.).

McConnell has rebuffed calls to address tax revenues in the deficit talks, preferring a singular focus on spending.

McConnell’s office, ahead of Wednesday’s Democratic press conference, circulated the minority leader’s mid-June comments about reforming tax subsidies, in which he said the issue should instead be addressed in a broader — and separate — tax-reform package.

“The difficulty of doing tax reform in the context of the Biden discussions is pretty obvious. It's a big, comprehensive subject,” McConnell said June 14, referring to talks between Vice President Biden and Capitol Hill lawmakers on the debt ceiling, which President Obama has since joined directly. McConnell said tax subsidies should be addressed in a broad tax-reform bill.

“You'd look at preferences and subsidies and rates and all of that together. I would be surprised, frankly, if we get into the tax issue in the ... Biden discussions leading to a vote on the debt ceiling,” McConnell said.

But Sen. John CornynJohn CornynGOP senators to donors: Stick with us regardless of Trump Hopes dim for mental health deal Overnight Finance: Senate punts on Zika funding | House panel clears final spending bill | Biz groups press Treasury on tax rules | Obama trade rep confident Pacific deal passes this year MORE (R-Texas), who heads the Senate Republicans’ political campaign arm, told reporters Wednesday that he would be open to killing the ethanol subsidy in a debt-reduction plan. “I wouldn’t be opposed to that,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT
Cornyn, however, then highlighted the GOP push to win major spending cuts, and expressed doubt that tax revenues could be addressed in the deficit talks. “I just don’t know if there is enough time to do it in a responsible way,” he said.   

Sen. Lamar AlexanderLamar AlexanderGOP senators to donors: Stick with us regardless of Trump Overnight Healthcare: Mysterious new Zika case | Mental health bill in doubt | Teletraining to fight opioids Hopes dim for mental health deal MORE (R-Tenn.) has called for examining a range of "unwarranted" energy-related tax breaks, but has similarly expressed doubt about tackling the issue in the deficit talks.

But Schumer sought to emphasize that some Republicans have acknowledged the need to address revenues in a wider budget package, citing the bipartisan “Gang of Six” senators — which Sen. Tom CoburnTom CoburnThe Trail 2016: Words matter Ex-Sen. Coburn: I won’t challenge Trump, I’ll vote for him Coburn: I haven't seen 'self-discipline' from Trump MORE (R-Okla.) later abandoned — that explored a mix of spending cuts and tax revenues.

He cast McConnell’s position as fealty to Americans for Tax Reform President Grover Norquist, who argues that any reductions in tax credits or deductions should be matched with cutting tax rates.

“Leader McConnell has decided to walk out on the same limb as Grover Norquist, he is being adamant that we should figure out a way to achieve $4 trillion dollars in debt reduction without including any revenues at all,” Schumer said.

ADVERTISEMENT
The Democrats’ use of the ethanol vote as a gambit in the deficit talks comes amid ongoing negotiations about a compromise on repealing the ethanol blenders’ credit.

Sens. Dianne FeinsteinDianne FeinsteinHotel lobby cheers scrutiny on Airbnb GOP platform attempts middle ground on encryption debate Week ahead: Encryption fight poised to heat up MORE (D-Calif.), Amy KlobucharAmy KlobucharSenate Dems push Obama for more Iran transparency Senators launch broadband caucus Spotify vs. Apple comes to Washington MORE (D-Minn.) and John ThuneJohn ThuneFCC chief pushes phone companies to offer free robocall blocking How the new aviation law will affect your travel GOP chairman seeks answers about Tesla’s autopilot feature MORE (R-S.D.) are in talks about a compromise plan that would quickly end the blenders’ credit — which is slated to expire at year’s end — and apply the savings to deficit reduction and other ethanol industry support.

Feinstein and Coburn have led the charge to simply kill the roughly $6 billion annual blenders’ tax credit, and the ethanol import tariff.

The Minnesota and South Dakota senators — who are allies of ethanol producers — oppose plans to kill subsidies without providing other industry assistance, such as extending separate tax credits for producing next-wave, cellulosic ethanol.

While Feinstein suggested Tuesday that a deal was at hand, she told reporters Wednesday that talks remain ongoing. “What I thought was going to be done isn’t done,” she said in the Capitol.

Thune, in the late morning Wednesday, said that all issues are not yet resolved. “The credit will go away ... but there is an issue that we still need to get settled on,” Thune said in the Capitol. He didn’t provide specifics.

Klobuchar also noted Wednesday that negotiations are ongoing.

“Every month [the ethanol blenders’ credit continues] is $400 million. You want to get it done as soon as possible so you can put more into the debt reduction, basically, and so that’s why there is an incentive for everyone to come together,” Klobuchar said.