Oil industry group says SEC must pull back transparency rule

The rules, required under 2010’s Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform law, require companies to provide the SEC data about payments for production licenses, taxes, royalties and other aspects of energy and mineral projects in countries where they operate.

The disclosure rule is aimed at ending the “resource curse” in which some energy- and mineral-rich nations in Africa and elsewhere are plagued by high levels of corruption, conflict and poverty.

Sens. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) and Ben Cardin (D-Md.) authored the provision in the Dodd-Frank law.

Western oil companies say they, too, support disclosure.

But they allege the SEC rule could place them at a disadvantage when competing for contracts against state-owned or state-controlled companies that would not be captured by the mandates, such as Russia’s Gazprom and the China National Petroleum Company.

API is pressing the SEC to include provisions that they say would help avoid competitive harms, such as allowing aggregate payment information by country.

The new letter also notes that the SEC should “define ‘project’ to mean activities in a particular geologic basin or province, and should include only those projects that reasonable investors would consider ‘material.’”

The industry is also seeking exemption from the requirements if the disclosure would violate the laws of a host country.

API argues that the proposed rule’s examination of its economic effects is so lacking that it “would not survive judicial review.”

But human rights groups — not to mention George Soros — are pushing back against industry attempts to win various exemptions that activists argue would gut the rules.

More in Energy & Environment

Oil industry to EPA: Don’t move goalposts with ozone rule

Read more »