By Laura Barron-Lopez - 11/14/14 02:04 PM EST
Sen. Mary LandrieuMary Landrieu oil is changing the world and Washington Ex-Sen. Kay Hagan joins lobby firm Republican announces bid for Vitter’s seat MORE (D-La.) and her allies are one vote away from securing a filibuster-proof majority of 60 votes for the Keystone XL oil pipeline in the Senate.
Sen. Michael BennetMichael BennetCruz-backed candidate wins GOP primary in Colorado Colorado GOP Senate race to unseat Dem incumbent is wide open Ted Cruz chooses sides in Colorado Senate primary MORE (D-Colo.) is expected to vote in favor of the oil sands project, Landrieu said Friday on a call with reporters.
“He feels very strongly about it,” she said.
Asked whether she has the 60 votes needed to move forward, Landrieu predicted she would get there.
"I am going to say I'm confident I'll have the 60 votes."
The House on Friday passed an identical version of the bill to approve Keystone, which was sponsored by Rep. Bill Cassidy (R-La.).
Cassidy and Landrieu are battling it out in a Louisiana Senate runoff scheduled for Dec. 6, pushing Keystone to the forefront of the agenda in Congress.
Landrieu has corralled 14 Democrats for the Senate Keystone bill, the latest being Sens. Tom CarperTom CarperDHS head pushes cyber reorganization White House seeks distance from ISIS transcript edit White House: Redaction decision was all Justice MORE (Del.) and Bennet.
Other Democrats who were seen as possible "yes" votes on the pipeline have declined to join the push.
Sen. Bill NelsonBill NelsonTop Dem welcomes industry TV box plan Congress must resolve net neutrality once and for all Senators seek state revenue sharing for offshore drilling MORE (D-Fla.), who was courted by Sen. John HoevenJohn HoevenDeath threats against senators remained on Twitter for 2 weeks Senate panel approves funding boost for TSA Overnight Energy: Senate Dems block energy, water bill a third time MORE (R-N.D.) and Landrieu, will vote “no” on the Keystone bill, his spokesman said Friday.
Nelson supports the pipeline but only with a ban on exporting the oil it transports.
Similarly, Sen. Chris CoonsChris CoonsAttorney general says she will defer to FBI on Clinton emails Lynch pressured to recuse herself after Clinton tarmac meeting Lynch meeting with Bill Clinton creates firestorm for email case MORE (D-Del.) said he would against approving the project, which would ship Canadian crude oil from Alberta to Gulf Coast refineries.
A possible fence-sitter, Sen. Angus KingAngus KingDon’t let Congress legislate science Senators roll out bipartisan gun proposal Dem Senate campaign chair endorses Clinton MORE (I-Maine), is “leaning no,” according to his spokesman, giving some hope to Keystone supporters that he might change his mind.
Landrieu’s move to push a vote on the pipeline within minutes of Congress returning for the lame-duck session was unexpected, and seen as a move to boost her chances in the runoff against Cassidy.
Landrieu said she “didn’t ask for permission” when going to the floor Wednesday evening to request unanimous consent on a vote to pass a bill that approves construction of the pipeline.
“I didn’t tell Democratic leadership what I was going to do,” she said.
The move has been called a “hail-mary pass” by some Republicans, though they are not objecting to the vote.
Republicans have long pushed for approving Keystone, arguing President Obama is stalling on a project that would create jobs and boost the energy sector.
The House passed Cassidy’s bill, which adopted the language from Hoeven and Landrieu’s bill, on Friday in a 252-161 vote.
If the Senate passes that Keystone bill on Tuesday, it would head to President Obama’s desk for a possible veto.
Obama said lawmakers shouldn’t “short circuit” the current process at the State Department for reviewing the project.
“I’ve been clear in the past … and my position hasn’t changed, that this is a process that is supposed to be followed,” he said in Burma.
— This story was updated at 2:37 p.m.