Senate to vote on military biofuels purchases

The Senate is scheduled to vote on Udall's amendment to sweeping defense policy legislation at 2 p.m. Wednesday.

Sen. James InhofeJames (Jim) Mountain InhofeA third of Congress hasn’t held a town hall — it’s time to take action Anonymous affiliate publishes claimed list of GOP private contact info Wasting America’s nuclear opportunity MORE (R-Okla.) introduced the measure that blocked the Defense Department’s option to spend on biofuels when the bill was in the Senate Armed Services Committee. The House defense bill contains similar language.

He argued that biofuels are too expensive at a time when $500 billion of defense cuts are slated for the next decade. He also opposes using the military to expedite commercialization of energy technology.

“All these arguments that I’ve heard against it, none of them hold weight. All we’re doing is experimenting in green energy,” Inhofe said in a Wednesday floor speech.

Inhofe, along with Sen. John McCainJohn Sidney McCainRubio asks Army to kick out West Point grad with pro-communist posts The VA's woes cannot be pinned on any singular administration Overnight Defense: Mattis offers support for Iran deal | McCain blocks nominees over Afghanistan strategy | Trump, Tillerson spilt raises new questions about N. Korea policy MORE (R-Ariz.), initiated his charge against the military biofuels program after learning the Navy paid $12 million for 450,000 gallons of biofuel, amounting to about $26 per gallon.

“This is something the [Department of Energy] should be doing if anybody is going to be doing it,” Inhofe said.

But the program has the support of Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Navy Secretary Ray Mabus. They call it vital for energy security, saying it gives the military more fuel options and loosens it from foreign oil’s grip.

Udall’s amendment also comes on the heels of 38 senators, mostly Democrats, sending a letter earlier this month urging the chamber's leadership to scrap the language.

Sen. Ron WydenRonald (Ron) Lee WydenHouse bill set to reignite debate on warrantless surveillance Senate confirms No. 2 spot at HHS, days after Price resigns Overnight Cybersecurity: Equifax CEO faces outraged lawmakers | Dem presses voting machine makers on cyber defense | Yahoo says 3 billion accounts affected by 2013 breach MORE (D-Ore.), who signed the letter, said Wednesday that because the Defense Department is the nation’s largest energy user, “[f]luctuations in global energy prices can have a dramatic, dramatic” impact on spending.

Wyden said defense spending on research and development would help bring biofuel costs down. He called dollar-for-dollar comparisons between petroleum and biofuels are disingenuous because the fuel technology has not yet reached commercial scale.

This post was updated at 1:34 p.m.