Lawmakers negotiating an energy reform package have run out of time to come to a deal.
Speaker Paul Ryan
Paul Davis RyanPaul Ryan: 'I don't know' if there's a difference between Trump and Moore accusers DACA advocates see efforts gaining steam in the House Senate Democrats reject initial DACA offer MORE’s office said Wednesday that Congress will not pass an energy reform bill this session, scrapping two years of work lawmakers had hoped would yield the first major energy package in a decade.
The announcement, coming days ahead of Congress's expected holiday adjournment, means the end for behind-the-scenes negotiations aimed at combining the energy bills passed separately by the House and Senate this year.
Spokespeople for chief Senate negotiators Sens. Lisa Murkowski
Lisa Ann MurkowskiOvernight Finance: GOP to reduce tax relief by 0B to win over deficit hawks | Republicans eye two-week spending bill | Fed official urges caution on digital currency | Security of auditing system under scrutiny Don’t sneak Arctic oil drilling into tax bill Senate GOP incorrectly tweets that it passed tax bill MORE (R-Alaska) and Maria Cantwell
Maria Elaine CantwellDon’t sneak Arctic oil drilling into tax bill CNN to host tax-reform debate pitting Cruz, Scott against Sanders, Cantwell Democrats scramble to contain Franken fallout MORE (D-Wash.) didn’t immediately comment Wednesday.
Members began working on an energy reform effort after the 2014 elections, with the goal of passing a bill to expand energy production and streamline federal rules this session. The energy industry was also hopeful the effort would result in legislation.
But the House and Senate went in different directions with their bills, setting up a difficult end-of-session effort to reconcile them.
In its bill, the House included conservative provisions opposed by Democrats, such as a GOP package to relieve the California drought and a measure to bypass environmental regulations for energy projects on Native American land, among others.
The Senate bill was less broad and attracted more bipartisan support, aiming to clear the way for liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports, expand energy efficiency programs and lock in federal conservation programs indefinitely.
Members convened a conference committee in September but couldn’t bridge the significant gap between their bills.
As of November, Murkowski and Cantwell said in a statement that month, negotiators were still grappling with issues “related to LNG exports, sportsmen’s, the Land and Water Conservation Fund, hydropower, natural gas pipelines, manufacturing, innovation, carbon benefits of biomass, critical minerals” and “provisions related to California’s drought crisis, to remedy wildfire funding challenges, and to improve forest management.”