Alaska senators press White House on energy

Begich’s colleague, Sen. Lisa MurkowskiLisa MurkowskiFeds to sell 14 million barrels from oil reserve Immigration battlefield widens for Trump, GOP Trump barrage stuns McConnell and his allies MORE (R), was tougher on the White House this week.

Murkowski took to the Senate floor Thursday and made lengthy remarks alleging the White House fiscal year 2011 budget request doesn’t match Obama’s pledges of support in the State of the Union speech for nuclear power and oil-and-gas development.

“During his State of the Union Address, the President called for tough decisions to be made regarding new development. I had actually hoped he meant that his agencies were preparing to push forward with a plan that would allow America to develop more of its resources,” said Murkowski, the top Republican on the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.

“But it appears I was mistaken. Instead of seeking to increase production, the budget request includes at least 21 new taxes and fees for the oil, natural gas, and coal industries – 21 new taxes and fees. Collectively, these increases would raise producers' costs of business by an estimated $80 billion,” she added. “That is going to translate into higher energy costs for consumers, fewer jobs for the American people. We cannot forget what basic economics tells us: When you tax something, you get less of it. So we will probably become even more dependent on foreign energy as well.”