Sen. Susan CollinsSusan CollinsGOP senator won't vote to defund Planned Parenthood GOP senator grilled over DeVos vote during town hall GOP senator: Flynn should testify on Russia MORE (R-Maine) said Friday that lawmakers should consider attaching the climate change bill she co-sponsored with Sen. Maria CantwellMaria CantwellA guide to the committees: Senate Trump signs bill undoing Obama coal mining rule Nine Dem senators say hiring freeze hurting trade enforcement MORE (D-Wash.) to separate energy legislation on the Senate floor.
Such a move would bypass the broad energy and climate plan that Sens. John KerryJohn KerryFormer Obama officials say Netanyahu turned down secret peace deal: AP How dealmaker Trump can resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict John Kerry to teach at Yale on global issues MORE (D-Mass.), Lindsey GrahamLindsey GrahamCNN to host town hall featuring John McCain, Lindsey Graham Club for Growth launches ad targeting GOP tax writer Dem senator asks for 'top to bottom' review of Syria policy MORE (R-S.C.) and Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) plan to unveil next month.
But Collins noted in an interview with the Clean Skies network that while she and Cantwell “wait with great interest” to see what Kerry, Graham and Lieberman come up with, the trio has yet to produce an actual bill.
“Another option is for an energy bill, there is a bipartisan energy bill with Senators Bingaman and Murkowski, to be brought to the Senate floor, and we could add the CLEAR Act to that bill, that might be a way to proceed as well,” Collins said.
Collins is referring to broad energy legislation that the Energy and Natural Resources Committee approved last June.
That measure – which Committee Chairman Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.) wants brought to the floor – includes new support for energy efficiency and imposes a national renewable electricity mandate.
The bill also expands oil-and-gas drilling in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. But it does not include limits on greenhouse gas emissions.
The CLEAR Act that Cantwell and Collins are pushing would set limits on “upstream” sources of carbon dioxide – oil-and-gas producers, coal companies and petroleum importers – entering the U.S. economy, and return the bulk of the money from federal auctions of carbon permits to consumers directly. It would also place very tight restrictions on carbon permit trading that freeze Wall Street banks out of the emissions trading market.
Kerry, Graham and Lieberman plan to use a different approach that includes, among other things, a cap-and-trade system for power plants and fees on oil companies to address motor fuel greenhouse gas emissions.
They say some ideas on consumer refunds and carbon trading restrictions will be drawn from the Cantwell-Collins plan, but have not provided specifics.
Senate Majority Leader Harry ReidHarry ReidHopes rise for law to expand access to experimental drugs If Gorsuch pick leads to 'crisis,' Dems should look in mirror first Senate confirms Mulvaney to be Trump’s budget chief MORE (D-Nev.) hopes to bring energy and climate legislation to the floor this year, but what the Senate might take up – and when – remains in flux.