“Time after time, Washington has promised to bring down the debt, but then kept the spending going – increasing the mountain of debt our kids and grandkids will have to pay for,” Hatch said.
The senators’ announcement came on the same day the Congressional Budget Office released its estimate saying the federal budget deficit increased to $1.5 trillion this fiscal year.
The proposed amendment — which currently has the support of 19 other Republican senators — would mandate spending not exceed revenues in any given fiscal year. It would also limit federal spending to 20 percent of gross domestic product and force any legislation that raises taxes to get two-thirds approval in both the House and the Senate.
The planks in the amendment could be pushed aside if the United States is at war or in a military conflict, as well as with the support of two-thirds of both houses of Congress.
On Wednesday, several top Democrats pushed back at the amendment in various news conferences on Capitol Hill. Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.), the chairman of the Budget Committee, said he had not examined the measure, but added he could not support it if it was similar to past proposals — which he said raided the Social Security trust fund to make up for current spending.
For their part, Sen. Dick DurbinDick DurbinDem leaders try ‘prebuttal’ on Trump Dems bringing young undocumented immigrants to Trump's speech Senate Dem fears White House 'cover-up' of Russia ties MORE (D-Ill.), the majority whip, and Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), the ranking member of the House Budget Committee, both signaled they believed balancing the budget should not involve the Constitution and instead should be done through more normal legislative channels.
At a news conference discussing the amendment, Cornyn said the group had not yet reached out to Democrats for support. But the Texan also noted that the push for the amendment had just begun and that 11 Democratic senators had backed the idea in a 1997 vote.
Hatch and Cornyn have also noted the 1997 balanced budget amendment received 66 votes in the Senate — one short of the number needed to advance.
Of the Democratic senators who voted yes at that time, four — Max BaucusMax BaucusFive reasons why Tillerson is likely to get through Business groups express support for Branstad nomination The mysterious sealed opioid report fuels speculation MORE of Montana, Tom HarkinTom HarkinGrassley challenger no stranger to defying odds Clinton ally stands between Sanders and chairmanship dream Do candidates care about our health or just how much it costs? MORE of Iowa, Herb Kohl of Wisconsin and Mary LandrieuMary LandrieuFive unanswered questions after Trump's upset victory Pavlich: O’Keefe a true journalist Trump’s implosion could cost GOP in Louisiana Senate race MORE of Louisiana — are still in the chamber. (The current vice president, Joe BidenJoe BidenNew DNC chair Perez will attend Trump's speech as former rival's guest Lewandowski: Perez ‘doesn’t understand what’s going on in America’ Perez to hit the Sunday shows following election victory MORE, also voted yes.)
Lawmakers in the House are also moving forward with proposed balanced budget amendments. One measure from Rep. Bob GoodlatteBob GoodlatteHouse panel to hold hearing on foreign surveillance law A guide to the committees: House Obama-era cash for cronies under House fire MORE (R-Va.) already has 160 co-sponsors, including a handful of Democrats.