Liberals cheer as Warren comes out swinging in first Senate hearing

Liberal activists who helped elected Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth WarrenSenate nixes Obama-era workplace safety rule Five takeaways from Labor pick’s confirmation hearing Warren: 'No confidence' in Trump's Labor pick MORE to the Senate are on cloud nine after an aggressive performance from the former professor in her debut on the Banking Committee.

Warren (D-Mass.) dressed down federal regulators at a hearing on Thursday, forcing them to admit they couldn’t remember the last time they brought a bank to trial.

For the senator’s backers, who spent millions helping elect her to the Senate, it was all they had hoped for and more.

“We spent a year rallying voters and activists to her side, and moments like this make it all worth it,” said Stephanie Taylor, co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee.

Many in Washington had wondered whether Warren would dial down her combative rhetoric in the Senate and adopt the low-key approach that is favored by freshman senators.

But Warren showed she’d be anything but a shrinking violet in the upper chamber, raising hopes on the left that she will rally support on Capitol Hill for more aggressive prosecution of financial misdeeds.

“The question I want to ask if how tough you are,” Warren told regulators at the hearing on the implementation of the Dodd-Frank financial law. “I’m really concerned that ‘too big to fail’ has become too big for trial.”

The officials on hand described their efforts to enforce the financial sector, but Warren would not let the subject drop. Regulator eventually conceded they could not recall the last time they went to trial.

Elisse Walter, the chairwoman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, pushed back against Warren after the hearing was over.

“You have to use your resources effectively, and I think Sen. Warren was suggesting that we should take big Wall Street banks to trial even when we’re getting all the relief we could get at trial through a settlement,” she told reporters. “I don’t think that’s an efficient use of our resources. I understand that point of view, but I don’t agree with it.”

Activists hope the dust-up with regulators is only the beginning.

“These bank regulators need to hold Wall Street accountable on behalf of consumers, and Elizabeth Warren is making sure that happens,” Taylor said.

Since the financial crisis, federal regulators and prosecutors have racked up settlements worth hundreds of millions of dollars from a range of institutions, including some of the biggest names on Wall Street.

But many in Congress say those penalties are insufficient and want the Obama administration to put wrongdoers on trial.

Warren brought the spotlight to that notion, joining a number of lawmakers who feel Wall Street has gotten off easy after committing high crimes against the economy.

Sens. Sherrod BrownSherrod BrownRNC drops six-figure ad buy for Supreme Court, healthcare fight Overnight Finance: White House backs off stock market boasts as Dow, Nasdaq drop | Trump budget shifts costs to rural voters who elected him | Fight over CEO pay rule heats up Overnight Finance: Biz groups endorse Trump's Labor pick | New CBO score coming before health bill vote | Lawmakers push back on public broadcasting cuts MORE (D-Ohio) and Chuck GrassleyChuck GrassleyLive coverage: Day three of Supreme Court nominee hearing Live coverage: Day two of Supreme Court nominee hearing Grassley, CNN host spar over Trump wiretap claims MORE (R-Iowa) sent a letter in January to Attorney General Eric HolderEric H. HolderOvernight Tech: Senate moving to kill FCC's internet privacy rules | Bill Gates pushes for foreign aid | Verizon, AT&T pull Google ads | Q&A with IBM's VP for cyber threat intel Uber leadership sticking by CEO Top Dems prep for future while out of the spotlight MORE, asking if large financial institutions, due to their outsized role in markets, have effectively become “too big to jail.”

And earlier this month, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), the ranking member of the House Financial Services Committee, told Attorney General Eric Holder in a letter that she was “concerned” federal prosecutors had come up short in the hunt for Wall Street malfeasance.

"In the absence of any indictments in cases involving 'egregious' misconduct the negative incentives that encourage and reward rule breaking will remain unchecked," she wrote.

The Obama administration, including the president himself, have previously defended themselves against critiques by arguing that while mistakes were obviously made, not everything that happened leading up to the crisis broke the law.

And some Republicans contend that it is not up to Congress to determine what should and should not be prosecuted.

House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas) said Friday that plenty of bankers made mistakes, but it's not up to Congress to put them on trial.

"I'm Article 1 of the Constitution, I'm not represented in Article 3," he said, referring to the sections of the nation's founding document establishing the legislative and judiciary branches, respectively.

"Frankly, a lot of regulators made mistakes, a lot of bankers made mistakes, and it's up to our Justice Department and the judiciary to figure what's a mistake and, frankly, what's criminal fraud," he added.