FEATURED:

House Dems fire back on Social Security

“The two biggest causes of our current deficit are the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy and two wars that were never paid for,” said Becerra, the top Democrat of the Ways and Means subcommittee, about Social Security. “Now that the bill has come due, whose neck are Republicans trying to hang it on? Social Security — which has $2.6 trillion in reserves dedicated to paying the retirement, disability and survivor benefits that American taxpayers have earned.”

Last week, Factcheck.org, an initiative of the University of Pennsylvania’s Annenberg Public Policy Center, reported that some top Democrats were incorrect in claiming that Social Security did not contribute at all to the federal deficit. In fact, the group stated, the government had to borrow $37 billion last year for Social Security.

But as the fact-checking site also noted, Social Security generally is not seen as presenting the long-term fiscal hurdles that Medicare and Medicaid do. 

A spokeswoman for the House GOP responded to Becerra's statement by saying it showed Democrats want to avoid reality when it comes to Social Security.

"The sooner we secure Social Security’s future, the sooner we provide certainty for those who are counting on Social Security’s income safety net," the spokeswoman said. "Rather than resorting to scare tactics and false accusations, Democrats should work with Republicans to strengthen Social Security."

The latest back-and-forth comes as Washington officials are discussing how to deal with the long-term solvency of Social Security, which currently is projected to pay out full benefits for another quarter-century or so.

Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.), the chairman of the Budget Committee, has said he wants to work to ensure the program is solvent for the next 75 years but does not think that the program needs to be part of broader, long-term deficit discussions. For his part, Sen. Bernie SandersBernard (Bernie) SandersDems ponder gender politics of 2020 nominee 2020 Dem contenders travel to key primary states After Florida school shooting, vows for change but no clear path forward MORE (I-Vt.) and others are looking to block any potential efforts to cut Social Security benefits.

On the other side of the aisle, Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamCongress punts fight over Dreamers to March Pence tours Rio Grande between US and Mexico GOP looks for Plan B after failure of immigration measures MORE (R-S.C.) said this week that he will push legislation that would adjust benefits level and deal with the retirement age, which currently stands at 67 for those born in 1960 or later. 

The plan issued by President Obama’s fiscal commission last year would have gradually increased the age at which someone can receive full Social Security benefits, eventually reaching 69 by 2075. Conrad and some other lawmakers who are reportedly talking about deficit reduction — Sens. Tom CoburnThomas (Tom) Allen CoburnPaul Ryan should realize that federal earmarks are the currency of cronyism Republicans in Congress shouldn't try to bring back earmarks Republicans should know reviving earmarks is a political nightmare MORE (R-Okla.), Mike CrapoMichael (Mike) Dean CrapoBeware of the bank deregulation Trojan horse Senate Republicans call on Trump to preserve NAFTA Dems rip Trump's Fed pick as Senate panel mulls three key nominees MORE (R-Idaho) and Dick DurbinRichard (Dick) Joseph DurbinAmerica’s waning commitment to the promise of the First Amendment Senate rejects Trump immigration plan What to watch for in the Senate immigration votes MORE (D-Ill.), the majority whip — all served on the debt panel and endorsed its recommendations.