Baucus says he's 'no real expert on China'

Sen. Max BaucusMax BaucusChina moves to lift ban on US beef Overnight Healthcare: Zika fight stalls government funding talks | Census finds big drop in uninsured | Mental health bill faces wait Glover Park Group now lobbying for Lyft MORE (D-Mont.) told lawmakers Tuesday that he is not an expert on China.

"I'm no real expert on China," Baucus, President Obama's nominee to serve as U.S. ambassador to China, said in response to a question from Sen. Ron JohnsonRon JohnsonElection-year politics: Senate Dems shun GOP vulnerables Grassley accuses Reid of 'pure unfiltered partisanship' California to allow experimental drug treatments for the terminally ill MORE (R-Wis.).

ADVERTISEMENT
Baucus made the comment during his confirmation hearing after Johnson asked about China's decision to impose an air defense zone over international waters.

But a Baucus aide argued that the long-time senator was merely being humble about his knowledge. 

"Humility is the Montana way, and that’s an asset in diplomacy too," said Baucus spokesman Sean Neary in an email. 

The Montana Democrat said that while he wasn't an expert on China, "it is my strong belief that the Chinese people are just as proud as we Americans are proud."

He told the Senate Foreign Relations panel that the Chinese leadership is taking advantage of that pride to test America in the East China Sea.

"I can't really tell you the motivation of Chinese leadership but the approach that we should take is constructive engagement, talking but standing up, grounded in reality," he said.

Baucus is expected to easily win confirmation as ambassador. Aside from the expert gaffe and a few tough questions from Arizona GOP Sen. John McCainJohn McCainKerry: US 'on the verge' of suspending talks with Russia on Syria Trump, Clinton to headline Al Smith dinner Overnight Defense: Congress overrides Obama 9/11 veto | Pentagon breathes easy after funding deal | More troops heading to Iraq MORE, Baucus essentially breezed through Tuesday's hearing. A vote is expected on Feb. 4.

—This post was updated at 4:15 p.m.