By Bernie Becker - 09/09/14 08:32 PM EDT
The administration official calling House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa’s (R-Calif.) office last week had an odd request.
Could the Justice Department get some help leaking information about the IRS’s scrutiny of conservative groups? asked Brian Fallon, a top spokesman for Attorney General Eric HolderEric H. HolderRacial undercurrents inflame Uber fight over background checks Chaffetz seeks to hold Obama official in contempt over water rule Eric Holder goes to bat for Uber MORE.
After Issa spokesman Frederick Hill replied that Oversight Committee staffers would have to examine those documents first, the line went silent, and Fallon placed the call on hold for three minutes.
When he returned to the line, Fallon was “audibly shaken,” according to an account of the conversation that Issa recounts in a letter sent to Holder.
The Justice official then said there had been a “change in plans,” that no documents would be released on Friday and that the main reason for the call was to seek a thaw in relations between the department and Oversight Republicans.
Issa said it’s clear that the Justice official meant to call Democratic staff and argued the mix-up is proof that President Obama’s administration and Cummings have been collaborating to “prejudice the committee’s work through under-the-table coordination.”
“This highly partisan and combative approach to oversight by the department shows a disregard for the independent investigatory prerogatives of Congress and a deliberate attempt to influence the course of a congressional investigation,” Issa wrote to Holder, adding that it was “unseemly” for the department to favor one party over the other when it came to sharing information.
The documents, Issa added in the letter, are about Andrew Strelka, a former Justice attorney that once worked for Lois Lerner, the ex-IRS official at the center of the Tea Party controversy.
Issa’s letter does not name the administration official or the three members of his own staff that were on the call on Friday. But Fallon acknowledged Tuesday that he spoke last week with Hill, a longtime Issa aide — an account also confirmed by a congressional aide.
In a statement to The Hill, Fallon suggested that there was nothing out of the ordinary about his conversation with Oversight Republicans.
“There is nothing inappropriate about department staff having conversations with both the majority and minority staff as it prepares responses to formal inquiries,” Fallon said. “That includes conversations between the spokespeople for the department and the committee.”
As for Hill, Fallon said following Friday’s conversation, “I guess this means he won’t be interested in having coffee.”
An Oversight Democratic staffer did not comment directly on whether aides to Cummings had ever held discussions with Justice officials similar to the conversation described in Issa’s letter.
The aide said that Cummings and his staff “make their own independent decisions about when to release information to the public and do not improperly coordinate with any executive branch agency.”
“If Chairman Issa’s account is accurate, this sounds like a dumb request from a Justice Department press staffer that Democrats never received,” the aide added.
Issa’s letter leaves some questions unanswered as well. The letter says that the Justice official asked for an Issa staffer by name before giving the pitch that was presumably intended for Cummings’s aides, raising the question of how much collaboration goes on between the Democrats and the administration. Issa added that the Justice official in question — Fallon — had never called his communications department before.
Still, the letter adds a new wrinkle to the IRS controversy, which started well over a year ago when Lerner apologized for the agency’s treatment of Tea Party groups.
Congressional investigations into the IRS gained new intensity this year after the agency acknowledged it couldn’t find an untold number of Lerner’s emails between 2009 and 2011.
The IRS blamed that loss on Lerner’s computer crashing, and added Friday that it probably couldn’t find emails from another five staffers that dealt with tax-exempt applications from Tea Party groups.
Republicans have repeatedly accused the IRS of slow-walking their investigation into the agency, and the Justice Department of running a shoddy criminal investigation. Democrats say, even after 16 months, there’s no evidence that the IRS scrutiny was politically motivated.
Strelka, the lawyer at the center of Friday’s conversation, worked for Lerner before representing the IRS in a lawsuit filed by Z Street, a pro-Israel group.
Strelka was eventually removed from that case. But Issa and other Republicans say there’s a conflict of interest between his work at the IRS and Justice and have accused Justice of keeping them from interviewing Strelka.
In his letter, Issa asks Holder to detail how many times his aides have discussed matters with Oversight Democrats without the GOP’s involvement, and stressed that he didn’t buy the Justice official’s explanation that the purpose of Friday’s call was to open the lines of communication.
Hill added in a statement that when Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) was Oversight chairman, administration officials under then-President George W. Bush often wouldn’t meet with Republicans without Democratic staffers present.
“Friday’s misdirected request by the Justice Department underscores that the Obama Administration views the Committee’s ranking minority member more as a collaborative partner in thwarting oversight than as an actual independent overseer of the federal government,” Hill said.
The Democratic staffer on Oversight said it was rich of Issa to complain about selective leaks.
“The larger problem is that Chairman Issa’s staff routinely exclude Democratic staff from calls and meetings with federal officials,” the aide said. “Chairman Issa also routinely leaks documents — or portions of them — out of context and without any committee vote or debate.”
— This story was posted at 2:49 p.m. and updated at 5:07 p.m. and 8:32 p.m.