TRENDING:

SPONSORED:

Warren opposes derivatives bills with House traction

ADVERTISEMENT
Some Democrats on the House Financial Services Committee vocally opposed the bills when they were considered earlier this month, including the ranking member Maxine Waters (D-Calif.). Financial reform advocates have also staunchly opposed the bills. But each of the seven bills garnered overwhelming support from members of both parties. The House has yet to take up the measures on the floor.

Warren is joined in the effort to fight back against the bills by Treasury Secretary Jack LewJack LewOvernight Finance: House GOP plans short-term spending bill | Senate Republicans not happy | Yellen intends to finish term Lew: Don't paint Wall Street execs with 'broad brushstroke' Dumping Obama’s faux foreign tax legislation should be high on Trump's to-do list MORE, who warned that it was too soon to begin altering provisions tied to derivatives, while regulators are still writing rules implementing the original provisions.

"The derivatives provisions in the Wall Street Reform Act constitute an important part of the reforms being put in place to strengthen our financial system by improving transparency and reducing risks for market participants," he wrote to House members. "These reforms should not be weakened or repealed."

It remains to be seen whether the bills, if cleared by the House, will gain any traction in the Senate. The House passed similar measures in the last Congress, but the Senate did not take them up, as Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim JohnsonTim JohnsonCourt ruling could be game changer for Dems in Nevada Bank lobbyists counting down to Shelby’s exit Former GOP senator endorses Clinton after Orlando shooting MORE (D-S.D.) was unwilling to reopen Dodd-Frank to changes at that point. Members in both parties have expressed interest in considering technical changes to the law in this Congress.