Right wants changes to House plan

House conservatives are demanding changes to the GOP leadership's latest proposal to end the government shutdown and raise the debt ceiling. 

Republicans initially said a vote on the new plan would take place Tuesday, but they have already hedged on those plans given demands from their members. 

“We gave a bunch of different options that I know our leaders are considering right now,” Rep. Mick Mulvaney (R-S.C.) said. “It’s just tweaks.”

“I think we are putting some good steps toward something the House would be able to support before the end of the day,” Mulvaney added. 

The latest House GOP plan would modify a deal being developed in the Senate to end the shutdown, fund the government through Jan. 15 and raise the debt ceiling until Feb. 7. 

The House plan would also delay for two years a tax on medical devices and scrap healthcare subsidies for lawmakers, the president, the vice president and Cabinet members who must enroll in ObamaCare, among other changes. 

Under ObamaCare now, lawmakers and staff members are required to enroll through the program but can still receive the tax subsidies they get under federal healthcare plans.

Conservatives in the House want congressional staff to also be prohibited from receiving an employer contribution to help offset the costs of insurance.

Under the healthcare law, lawmakers and staff are required to enroll in insurance through ObamaCare's exchanges, but currently are still slated to receive the contribution from the federal government they now enjoy.

“We have always thought that made sense,” said Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), who said he would see if he could vote for the new plan based on talks between members and their leaders. 

Rep. Charles BoustanyCharles William BoustanyDems face hard choice for State of the Union response Americans worried about retirement should look to employee ownership Top Lobbyists 2017: Hired Guns MORE Jr. (R-La.) said that party leadership and the conservatives were “not that far apart.”

He said the main tweak is putting original ObamaCare congressional subsidy language authored by Sen. David VitterDavid Bruce VitterWhere is due process in all the sexual harassment allegations? Not the Senate's job to second-guess Alabama voters The Senate 'ethics' committee is a black hole where allegations die MORE (R-La.) into the House GOP offer.

“My sense is that if the original Vitter language were in there, then we would get more support for it,” Boustany said. 

If GOP leaders bring a bill to the floor, it would almost certainly have to be approved with almost only Republican votes. 

The White House rejected the GOP proposal, and Democrats have panned it. President Obama is also meeting with House Democratic leaders Tuesday afternoon, a sign he is trying to get his side on the same page in the final hours before the Oct. 17 deadline set by the Treasury Department for raising the debt ceiling.

Senate Majority Leader Harry ReidHarry Mason ReidDems search for winning playbook Dems face hard choice for State of the Union response The Memo: Immigration battle tests activists’ muscle MORE (D-Nev.) has also warned that the House plan is dead on arrival in the Senate.

House leaders made it clear that they are listening to their members.

"We're still working through our issues," said House Budget Committee Chairman Paul RyanPaul Davis RyanGOP leaders pitch children's health funding in plan to avert shutdown Lawmakers see shutdown’s odds rising Fix what we’ve got and make Medicare right this year MORE (R-Wis.).

Other conservatives said they were pushing language that would allow employers to opt out of providing insurance that covers birth control and other services they find morally objectionable.

Rep. Tim Huelskamp (R-Kan.), a consistent thorn in leadership’s side, said that he was worried that there were “no religious liberty protections” in the original plan.

Jordan also said the lack of a "conscience clause" was one of the planks conservatives were fighting for.

Like Boustany, conservative Rep. David SchweikertDavid SchweikertFive obstacles to Trump's infrastructure ambitions The Hill's Whip List: Where Republicans stand on tax-reform bill GOP Senate hopeful Kelli Ward leads challengers in internal poll MORE (R-Ariz.) said conservatives were close to supporting their leadership's deal.

“There are a handful of things I think will make it better,” he said.

Schweikert said that BoehnerJohn Andrew BoehnerDems face hard choice for State of the Union response Even some conservatives seem open to return to earmarks Overnight Finance: Trump, lawmakers take key step to immigration deal | Trump urges Congress to bring back earmarks | Tax law poised to create windfall for states | Trump to attend Davos | Dimon walks back bitcoin criticism MORE had handled the whole situation “stunningly well."

“Remember who I am. I’m one of the four guys thrown off his committee for being cranky,” Schweikert said. “I’m very proud of the conference.”

Boustany shot down the idea espoused by some conservative members who wanted to see more action on spending in a debt-limit package, saying such a shift simply isn't practical at this point.

"Realistically, to get a pro-growth deficit reduction in place is going to take more time, and we don't have time," he said. "We have to do something now and hopefully get into earnest discussions."

The conservative demands also allowed some GOP lawmakers to say that they weren’t sure where the proposal was headed, and what their final take would be.

“I think that we’ve got to see if the current form is the final form before I make that decision,” Rep. Jack Kingston (R-Ga.) told reporters. “I don’t think that this is the final form, and that’s just one guy’s opinion.”

But some conservatives predicted that the GOP conference would stand together, just as it has in a string of recent floor votes.

— This story was posted at 11:37 a.m. and updated at 1:04 p.m.