Republicans walking tightrope ahead of budget resolution vote

Republicans walking tightrope ahead of budget resolution vote
© Greg Nash

Senate Republicans have little room for error as they push forward with a budget resolution that is key to tax reform.

They scored a small victory on Tuesday, when 50 senators agreed to start debate on the fiscal blueprint despite GOP Sens. Thad CochranWilliam (Thad) Thad CochranMississippi gov to fill Cochran seat with agriculture commissioner: report GOP leaders see finish line on omnibus deal McDaniel to run for open Senate seat in Miss. rather than challenge Wicker MORE (Miss.) and Richard ShelbyRichard Craig ShelbySpending bill delay raises risk of partial government shutdown support Lawmakers race to prevent shutdown amid last-minute snags GOP leaders see finish line on omnibus deal MORE (Ala.) missing the vote.

After the initial vote, Cochran announced he had returned to Washington and would be “taking part in the debate on the budget and tax cuts,” giving Republicans more breathing room.

But GOP leadership is still facing demands from key holdouts, giving them a narrow path to get the budget through the Senate this week. With a 52-seat majority, Republicans can only afford to lose two GOP senators and still let Vice President Pence break a tie.

Sen. Rand PaulRandal (Rand) Howard PaulTrump formally sends Pompeo nomination to Senate Spending bill delay raises risk of partial government shutdown support Overnight Defense: Senate sides with Trump on military role in Yemen | Dem vets push for new war authorization on Iraq anniversary | General says time isn't 'right' for space corps MORE (R-Ky.) is threatening to vote against the budget if spending levels are not scaled back and is blasting demands from Republican defense hawks to boost military spending.

“Senators [John] McCain and [Lindsey] Graham are torpedoing the budget by insisting on busting the budget caps for more spending,” Paul said in a tweet on Tuesday.

Paul said during a conference call with reporters that he is asking leadership to stick to the budget caps. He said boosting defense spending through the overseas contingency fund — a war account that isn’t subjected to the rules — is a “charade.”

“I’ve told my leadership, I’ve told the president ... and I said look, I’m all in, I want to be supportive, I’m a yes vote, but we have to obey our own rules,” he said.

The budgetary caps imposed in the 2011 Budget Control Act were intended to force cooperation between Republicans and Democrats by strictly limiting both defense and nondefense discretionary spending.

Paul said the $43 billion in contingency funding should be removed from the budget, arguing it violates the spirit of that agreement.

The Kentucky senator voted to start debate on the budget, but he said that was largely “out of respect for the president.” He has been locked in negotiations with the White House over the resolution.

Graham (R-S.C.) and McCain (R-Ariz.) fired back at Paul.

“Rand’s wanting everything. ... I don’t know how long it takes to figure out where this guy is coming from. ... He’s never getting to yes. He’s always got a reason to be no,” Graham said.

Graham in a tweet warned Paul that he better not “screw up” tax reform.

McCain, who once called Paul a “wacko bird,” dismissed the Republican as speaking only for himself.

“I don’t know anybody who pays any attention to him,” McCain said. Paul himself was unable to name another senator who was prepared to vote against the budget over the same issues.

McCain announced on Tuesday evening that he would support the budget because it sets up tax reform, but he urged the White House and Congress to get a larger deal to boost defense spending.

“At the end of the day, we all know that the Senate budget resolution will not impact final appropriations. To do that, Congress and the White House must negotiate a budget agreement that will lift the caps on defense spending and enable us to adequately fund the military,” McCain said in a statement.

Republicans are optimistic they will ultimately pass the budget because their members want to move on to tax reform. The budget will allow Republicans to pass a tax bill through the Senate on a majority vote.

“I think people understand that it’s more about tax reform than the budget, and it’s a necessary step so we can move to tax reform,” said Sen. John KennedyJohn Neely KennedyMORE (R-La.).

Senate Majority Whip John CornynJohn CornynWhite House officials expect short-term funding bill to avert shutdown Spending bill delay raises risk of partial government shutdown support GOP leaders to Trump: Leave Mueller alone MORE (R-Texas) added, “No one should be confused about this: that a vote for the budget is a vote for tax reform. Conversely, a vote against the budget is a vote against tax reform.”

Tuesday’s vote kicked off 50 hours of debate followed by a marathon voting session, known as a vote-a-rama.

Under the freewheeling process, senators can force a vote on any proposal they want.

A vote on the budget in 2015 wrapped up after 3 a.m. despite pleas from leadership to speed things up. Voting on the fiscal 2017 budget in January, which was used to let ObamaCare repeal avoid a Democratic filibuster, lasted until after 1 a.m.

Senate Minority Leader Charles SchumerCharles (Chuck) Ellis SchumerConscience protections for health-care providers should be standard Pension committee must deliver on retirement promise Dem super PAC launches ad defending Donnelly on taxes MORE (D-N.Y.) suggested that their efforts in the budget debate would largely be focused on messaging against the GOP tax bill, instead of a free-for-all.

“We’d like to focus our amendments … and not have a whole Christmas tree of everything,” Schumer said when asked about the party’s floor strategy.

The amendments, according to Schumer, would largely fall into four buckets: that the GOP tax plan would create a “huge hole” in the deficit; that the tax plan would hurt the middle class; that it would cut Medicare and Medicaid; and that it would provide tax cuts to high-income earners.

“Rest assured, Democrats will use the process to put our Republican colleagues on the spot here. How can they support such a plan?” he asked.

Sen. Mark WarnerMark Robert WarnerOvernight Cybersecurity: Senate Intel releases election security findings | Facebook to meet with officials on Capitol Hill amid Cambridge Analytica fallout | Orbitz admits possible breach Facebook to meet with officials on Capitol Hill amidst Cambridge Analytica fallout Senate Intel releases summary of election security report MORE (D-Va.) said he would file an amendment to keep Senate pay-as-you-go rules in place for tax reform. Republicans need to bend those rules, which are meant to limit deficit spending, to ensure that Democrats don’t block their tax reform efforts.

“Pay-go is one of the ones that, for anyone who claims to have any fiscal responsibility, we’ve got to keep those rules in place,” Warner said.

Senate Democrats are also planning to offer an amendment to block the GOP from using the budget process to more easily allow oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

But Democrats, echoing Schumer, predicted they would keep their amendments focused on the tax debate.

“The point we want to make is not terribly complicated. ... I’m not sure this will be amongst the longer vote-a-ramas in the history of the Senate,” said Sen. Chris MurphyChristopher (Chris) Scott MurphyOvernight Defense: Senate sides with Trump on military role in Yemen | Dem vets push for new war authorization on Iraq anniversary | General says time isn't 'right' for space corps Senate sides with Trump on providing Saudi military support Senate, Trump clash over Saudi Arabia MORE (D-Conn.).

Added Sen. Sherrod BrownSherrod Campbell BrownDemocratic senator: People don’t know what’s going on between Trump and Putin Power struggle threatens to sink bank legislation Pension committee must deliver on retirement promise MORE (D-Ohio): “It’s not going to be a zillion amendments.”