Democrats resume serious talks with GOP on Wall Street reform

Senate Democrats and Republicans said a deal on Wall Street reform could be reached by next week after the two sides on Tuesday resumed negotiations in earnest.

Faced with solid GOP opposition, Democrats acknowledged they do not have enough votes to begin debate on a bill crafted by Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), who has re-launched talks with Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.).

Dodd said he hoped to wrap up talks by next week.

Sen. Bob CorkerRobert (Bob) Phillips CorkerOvernight Defense: Senate passes 0B defense bill | 3,000 US troops heading to Afghanistan | Two more Navy officials fired over ship collisions Senate passes 0B defense bill Corker pressed as reelection challenges mount MORE (R-Tenn.), who for a time spearheaded negotiations on the bill, said lawmakers are very close to an agreement.

“I think there’s a possibility we get where we need before the vote even takes place,” Corker said.

There were signs Tuesday that Democrats were considering a major concession: dropping a $50 billion fund designed to wind down troubled banks — with assets of at least $50 billion — that pose a risk to the financial system.

 “We had a long discussion in our caucus today,” Senate Majority Leader Harry ReidHarry ReidThe Memo: Trump pulls off a stone-cold stunner The Memo: Ending DACA a risky move for Trump Manchin pressed from both sides in reelection fight MORE (D-Nev.) told reporters after the Democrats’ lunch meeting. “That’s something we’re going to take a look at.”

Sens. Jack ReedJohn (Jack) Raymond ReedOvernight Defense: Senate passes 0B defense bill | 3,000 US troops heading to Afghanistan | Two more Navy officials fired over ship collisions Senate passes 0B defense bill This week: Senate wrapping up defense bill after amendment fight MORE (D-R.I.) and Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) are leading negotiations to set up the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and regulate financial derivatives that would fall under the jurisdiction of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

“It looks like to me that Judd and Jack are coming close to an agreement,” Corker said. “We may avoid a drama.”

Senate Agriculture Committee Chairwoman Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) is negotiating with Sen. Saxby ChamblissSaxby ChamblissFormer GOP senator: Let Dems engage on healthcare bill OPINION: Left-wing politics will be the demise of the Democratic Party GOP hopefuls crowd Georgia special race MORE (Ga.), the panel’s ranking Republican, to regulate commodities-related derivatives that fall under the jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Senate sources familiar with the talks say they are proceeding well.

“I can tell you … that Sen. Shelby thinks there’s a very serious effort to re-engage and get a result,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellSenate passes 0B defense bill Overnight Health Care: New GOP ObamaCare repeal bill gains momentum Overnight Finance: CBO to release limited analysis of ObamaCare repeal bill | DOJ investigates Equifax stock sales | House weighs tougher rules for banks dealing with North Korea MORE (R-Ky.) said Tuesday. “Serious discussions are under way, and that’s a good sign.”

The two parties had appeared headed for a partisan showdown on the Senate floor until the talks resumed. The White House had halted negotiations last month, believing Republicans would succumb to political pressure to support the Democratic bill.

 The dynamic changed after 41 Republicans signed a letter to Reid pledging unified opposition to the bill. On Monday, Sen. Susan CollinsSusan Margaret CollinsSenate Dems hold floor talk-a-thon against latest ObamaCare repeal bill Ryan: Graham-Cassidy 'best, last chance' to repeal ObamaCare Collins skeptical of new ObamaCare repeal effort MORE (Maine), a pivotal Republican vote, said she would support a GOP filibuster if Democrats brought Dodd’s bill to the floor without changes.

 “What happened as a result of the 41 letter is that serious talks have resumed,” McConnell said.

 “We had a chance to get a report from Sen. Shelby and others at lunch today. I’m convinced now there is a new element of seriousness attached to this, other than try[ing] to score political points,” McConnell said.

Democrats and Republicans have been close to reaching an agreement for weeks, according to people familiar with the negotiations. The biggest obstacle to the deal appears to have been politics more than policy differences.

 “We’ve been this close for weeks,” said a Democratic aide, indicating the difference with a half-inch of space between thumb and forefinger. “It’s just been a political decision by the GOP leadership over whether to sign on.”

 Republicans have been leery of signing on to a deal out of concern that the party’s conservative base would see them as caving in to Democrats.

Democrats have played politics themselves. When a deal was within reach in early March, White House officials cut off the negotiations, convinced they could score political points by portraying Republicans as the servants of big banks.

McConnell said he told President Barack ObamaBarack Hussein ObamaGOP rep: North Korea wants Iran-type nuclear deal Dems fear lasting damage from Clinton-Sanders fight Iran's president warns US will pay 'high cost' if Trump ditches nuclear deal MORE at a meeting last week that White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel had cut off negotiations.

 “I pointed to Rahm Emanuel and said, ‘You pulled them back and ended the conversations, so I guess you decided it was better to have a political issue,’ ” McConnell said. The GOP leader said the president did not dispute his interpretation.

 Some of the political games continued in public on Tuesday, such as when Reid vowed to put the Dodd bill on the floor and force Republicans to kill it.

 “Remember, there are only 59 of us, so if a single Republican is not willing to join with us, there will be no Wall Street reform,” Reid said Tuesday, inviting the GOP to a high-stakes game of political chicken. “Republicans will have killed Wall Street reform. I am confident that will not happen.”

The $50 billion fund is one of the most controversial elements of the reform bill. Republicans argue that its mere existence will create a moral hazard and embolden banks to make risky trades in the future.

Democrats counter that the fund is necessary to bring about the orderly liquidation of a financial institution that threatens to trigger a financial crisis.

They note the $50 billion would be funded by large banks.

Republicans have also raised concerns about regulating banks through the Consumer Financial Protection Board.

One Republican Banking Committee source said the consumer-allied board could set new rules but that their enforcement should be left to prudential regulators, such as the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Reserve, which are more focused on the long-term health and viability of banks.

Republicans have also asked for provisions that would protect community banks from excessive regulation.

“We don’t have any Wall Street banks in South Dakota, but we have a lot of community banks, we have a lot of credit unions, we have a lot of smaller institutions that — that extend credit that are very, very worried about this,” said Sen. John ThuneJohn Randolph ThuneAviation panel recommends Trump roll back safety rules Overnight Regulation: House moves to block methane rule | Senators wrestle with allowing driverless trucks | EPA delays toxic waste rule Overnight Tech: Senate looks at self-driving trucks | Facebook to keep ads off fake news | House panel calls Equifax CEO to testify MORE (S.D.), chairman of the Senate GOP Policy Committee.