The White House said Thursday it would fight efforts under the Wall Street bill to limit states from pursuing tougher consumer regulations than the federal government.
Diana Farrell, deputy director of the National Economic Council, said the administration opposes amendments – including one backed by Sen. Tom CarperTom CarperDems unveil infrastructure plan, reach out to Trump Schumer to Trump: Work with Democrats on infrastructure bill Sanders set for clash with Trump’s budget pick MORE (D-Del.) – that would restrict state attorneys general.
“We intend to fight those and oppose those,” Farrell said on a conference call with the Iowa and Connecticut attorneys general.
Carper is the main sponsor of an amendment that is backed by 10 other centrist Democrats and Republicans. The question of how much power the federal government should have to preempt state officials is at the heart of efforts to set up a new consumer financial protection regulator.
The administration, most Democrats and consumer advocates
have pushed for more than a year to give greater power to the states to pursue
tougher standards than the new federal consumer regulator. They argue that in
recent years, particularly since 2004, the federal government has too often
overridden state law.
Republicans have resisted those efforts and have favored retaining current law on preemption.
The financial industry argues in favor of keeping current law and says greater powers for state attorneys general would hurt consumers by forcing banks to comply with myriad state rules.
“We’re not asking for any reduction in power granted to state attorneys general,” said Richard Hunt, president of the Consumer Bankers Association.
Hunt said the White House’s push “tells me that the administration has so little confidence in their new consumer agency."
“They are requesting additional enforcement authority from the states,” he said.
The Carper amendment would seek to limit state regulators from enforcing consumer regulations on national banks and their subsidiaries. Carper’s amendment would also remove a requirement in the pending Senate legislation that would require the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency to find in federal law a “substantive standard” on the type of regulation before the office moves to preempt.
"Carper's amendment is designed like Darth Vader's Deathstar, to destroy consumer protection," said Ed Mierzwinski, of U.S. Public Interest Research Group.
Carper is joined by a bipartisan group of senators, including Sens. Lamar AlexanderLamar AlexanderSanders set for clash with Trump’s budget pick HELP Committee won't hold second hearing for DeVos Trump, GOP set to battle on spending cuts MORE (R-Tenn.), Evan Bayh (D-Ind.), Saxby ChamblissSaxby ChamblissWyden hammers CIA chief over Senate spying Cruz is a liability Inside Paul Ryan’s brain trust MORE (R-Ga.), Bob CorkerBob CorkerSenate panel votes to confirm Tillerson Rubio to vote for Tillerson Top Dem comes out against Tillerson ahead of key vote MORE (R-Tenn.), John Ensign (R-Nev.), Michael Enzi (R-Wyo.), Johnny IsaksonJohnny IsaksonGOP senators: Give states the option of keeping ObamaCare Trump, Democrats can bridge divide to make college more affordable Trump picks Obama nominee for VA secretary MORE (R-Ga.), Tim JohnsonTim JohnsonCourt ruling could be game changer for Dems in Nevada Bank lobbyists counting down to Shelby’s exit Former GOP senator endorses Clinton after Orlando shooting MORE (D-S.D.), John ThuneJohn ThuneSenate panel approves slew of tech bills Sanders set for clash with Trump’s budget pick Overnight Tech: Uber, AT&T beef up lobbying | Pai is new FCC chairman | Skype coming to WH briefings | iPhone maker floats B US factory MORE (R-S.D.), George Voinovich (R-Ohio) and Mark WarnerMark WarnerLive coverage: Trump budget chief faces two Senate panels Obama's last law: Talent Act will enhance government efficiency GOP, Dems hear different things from Trump MORE (D-Va.).