Senators squabbled Tuesday over the future of a controversial investor visa program and called on top immigration and securities departments to crack down on rampant abuse.
The Senate Judiciary Committee grilled officials from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) on how agencies can step up oversight of the EB-5 visa program
But the biggest fight was with each other over whether the program should survive.
Senate powers are divided over the program, which lures cheap foreign capital on the promise of eventual citizenship. Despite agreements about ramping up oversight and transparency, a December reform bill sponsored by Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck GrassleyChuck GrassleyComey to testify before Senate Judiciary Committee GOP to kill language exempting staff from new ObamaCare repeal bill House cyber chairman wants to bolster workforce MORE (R-Iowa) and ranking Democrat Sen. Patrick LeahyPatrick LeahyHollywood, DC come together for First Amendment-themed VIP party The Hill's 12:30 Report Lawmakers talk climate for Earth Day, Science March MORE (Vt.) failed after senators fought back to protect home state interests.
"How many more intelligence reports are needed to understand the problems?,” asked Grassley in the hearing. “How many more projects in midtown Manhattan at the expense of rural America need to be highlighted? How many more headlines are needed before the program is going to be fixed?"
Evan as government investigations exposed rampant fraud and national security issues with the program, EB-5 visas have exploded in popularity, bringing billions of investment in U.S. businesses. The number of visas granted jumped from 3,000 in fiscal 2011 to over 9,000 in fiscal 2014, according to data from the State Department.
Sen. Charles SchumerCharles SchumerSchumer: NYC should refuse to pay for Trump’s security Reagan's 'voodoo economics' are precisely what America needs When political opportunity knocked, Jason Chaffetz never failed to cash in MORE (D-N.Y.) joined Sens. John CornynJohn CornynSenate's No. 2 Republican: Border tax 'probably dead' McConnell: Senate will pass short-term funding bill to avoid shutdown The Hill's 12:30 Report MORE (R-Texas) and Jeff FlakeJeff FlakeTrudeau, Trump speak for second night about US-Canada trade Trump says he may break up 9th Circuit Court after rulings go against him Trump administration weighing order to withdraw from NAFTA MORE (R-Arizona) to block the Grassley-Leahy bill last December. He’s called it an attack on urban investment and claimed the bill would hurt projects in wealthy areas that draw workers from nearby poor neighborhoods.
"This is not an issue of reforming,” said Schumer, who’s slated to lead Senate Democrats in the next Congress. "There was a regional fight, and there was an idea that urban areas like New York shouldn't receive EB-5 money."
Grassley and Leahy reject Schumer’s urban vs. rural framing. They’ve said their fixes were meant to bolster economies in low-income areas — what they call the original focus of the program.
“I'm not trying to keep rich neighborhoods in New York or Texas or elsewhere from getting capital. But they shouldn't be getting it all, and they shouldn't be getting it at a discount,” said Leahy, whose home state hosts a popular ski resort funded by the program.
“I want a fair share to rural and urban poor areas,” he said. “Affluent areas can take care of themselves.”
Even with regional divides, most senators insisted on fixes to fraud and national security blind spots to preserve economic growth the program brought to their states.
But Sen. Dianne FeinsteinDianne FeinsteinDemocrats exploring lawsuit against Trump Overnight Finance: Dems explore lawsuit against Trump | Full-court press for Trump tax plan | Clock ticks down to spending deadline Comey to testify before Senate Judiciary Committee MORE (D-Calif.), whose state has the most EB-5-funded businesses, said the program should lapse, citing dozens of fraud cases against business in California.
“I don't believe visas should be sold,” Feinstein told The Hill last week. "That's unfair, and from what I've seen, there may be good projects, but I've also seen some proposals that I would not call good projects, so I'm basically opposed to it."
Agency officials asked senators for more authority to weed out fraud and track investor money back to its source.
Nicholas Colucci, chief of the USCIS Immigrant Investor Service, called for expanded ability to collect data and check in on EB-5 businesses. He also said his department has bolstered its staff and expertise to monitor the program.
Stephen Cohen, associate director of the SEC’s enforcement division, highlighted successful anti-fraud cases and consulting with USCIS, but said his agency only reviews specific fraud cases, not applications, since it doesn’t administer EB-5.
Grassley dismissed those efforts, calling them “a bland attempt to fix the program” and “window dressing."