Obama trade deal taking a hit in presidential race

Obama trade deal taking a hit in presidential race
© Greg Nash

Lawmakers say harsh criticism leveled against President Obama’s Pacific Rim trade agreement from presidential candidates in both parties is further complicating its passage.

The stinging rhetoric against the 12-nation Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) comes on top of other challenges and could stifle what is already expected to be a difficult process.

“We knew once we got into the primary season both for members running in their primaries and the presidential primaries that it was going to make it difficult politically,” said Rep. Charles BoustanyCharles William BoustanyDems face hard choice for State of the Union response Americans worried about retirement should look to employee ownership Top Lobbyists 2017: Hired Guns MORE Jr. (R-La.), a member of the House Ways and Means Committee who backs the deal.

“So we have that and we have the problems we’re trying to resolve in the finalized agreement so it’s all going to delay things,” he added.

Rep. Gerry ConnollyGerald (Gerry) Edward ConnollyDemocrats cheer the end of voter fraud commission Democrat: 'Fraudulent' voter fraud commission got ugly death it deserved 8.8 million sign up for ObamaCare, nearly matching last year MORE (Va.), one of the two dozen or so House Democrats backing the deal, also said the rhetoric from the 2016 field is complicating progress on the TPP.

“If we had people out there campaigning in favor of it, it would provide some protective cover here, give us a little safe place to go now and then,” Connolly told The Hill.

“Beating the drums in opposition out there in any way, shape or form certainly doesn’t help the climate here,” he said. 

The United States and 11 partner nations signed the TPP in Auckland, New Zealand, last week, but it is unclear if the deal will be considered by Congress this year.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellSessions: 'We should be like Canada' in how we take in immigrants NSA spying program overcomes key Senate hurdle Overnight Finance: Lawmakers see shutdown odds rising | Trump calls for looser rules for bank loans | Consumer bureau moves to revise payday lending rule | Trump warns China on trade deficit MORE (R-Ky.) and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin HatchOrrin Grant HatchKoch groups: Don't renew expired tax breaks in government funding bill Hatch tweets link to 'invisible' glasses after getting spotted removing pair that wasn't there DHS giving ‘active defense’ cyber tools to private sector, secretary says MORE (R-Utah) say the sweeping agreement probably won’t come up for consideration until after the November elections, and could even get pushed into 2017. 

Hatch argued the TPP’s legislative process will be lengthy regardless of the opposition rippling through the electoral landscape.

“It’s always been hard, there’s nothing easy about that [passing trade deals],” Hatch told The Hill.  

“So we’ll just have to when we can do it. It’s always going to be hard because the vast majority of Democrats are against this even though it’s their president.”

Democrats are under pressure to oppose the deal because of opposition from unions and other liberal groups.

A number of business constituencies, including pharmaceutical companies, also have deep reservations about the deal. That has left Republicans lukewarm at best toward the agreement.

The fiery backlash against the president’s trade agenda coming from the 2016 field only makes a congressional fight less attractive. Opponents are arguing that the controversial trade deal would lower U.S. jobs and wages, a message that is resonating with some voters. 

Republican presidential hopeful Donald TrumpDonald John TrumpDems flip Wisconsin state Senate seat Sessions: 'We should be like Canada' in how we take in immigrants GOP rep: 'Sheet metal and garbage' everywhere in Haiti MORE has vowed to kill the TPP, calling it a “terrible one-sided deal,” while Ted CruzRafael (Ted) Edward CruzWith religious liberty memo, Trump made America free to be faithful again Interstate compacts aren't the right way to fix occupational licensing laws Texas Dem: ‘I don’t know what to believe’ about what Trump wants for wall MORE, the winner of the Iowa caucuses, has recently ramped up his anti-trade rhetoric. Marco RubioMarco Antonio RubioOvernight Cybersecurity: Bipartisan bill aims to deter election interference | Russian hackers target Senate | House Intel panel subpoenas Bannon | DHS giving 'active defense' cyber tools to private sector Senators unveil bipartisan push to deter future election interference Puerto Rico's children need recovery funds MORE, who has railed against the president’s economic policies, has yet to take a position on the TPP, although he did back fast-track authority last summer. 

On the Democratic side, Bernie SandersBernard (Bernie) SandersMellman: On Political Authenticity (Part 2) Former Sanders campaign manager: Don't expect email list to be shared with DNC Adult film star: Trump and Stormy Daniels invited me to 'hang out' MORE has pledged to dismantle Obama’s trade agenda if elected.

“As your president, not only will I make sure that the TPP does not get implemented, I will not send any trade deal to Congress that will make it easier for corporations to outsource American jobs overseas,” he said last week during an event in New Hampshire.

Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonIntel Dem decries White House 'gag order' after Bannon testimony 'Total free-for-all' as Bannon clashes with Intel members Mellman: On Political Authenticity (Part 2) MORE also opposes the TPP, even though she supported it as Obama’s secretary of State.

Rep. Dave ReichertDavid (Dave) George ReichertGOP angst over midterms grows New chairmen named for health, tax subcommittees House Foreign Affairs chairman to retire MORE (R-Wash.), chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee Trade Subcommittee, chalked up most of the critical trade talk to election-year political posturing.

He said he’s convinced that the next president can be persuaded to back a robust trade agenda.

“I’m hopeful that whoever is elected that when they come into office, we can sit down with the Ways and Means Committee, the [trade] ambassador and the new president and I’m sure we’ll be able to convince them the importance of trade and how important it is to the economy and how it does grow jobs,” he told The Hill. 

In the meantime, however, lawmakers wanting to move the TPP this year will have to endure criticism from the campaign trail.

Sen. Rob PortmanRobert (Rob) Jones PortmanFlake's anti-Trump speech will make a lot of noise, but not much sense Top GOP candidate drops out of Ohio Senate race Overnight Tech: Regulators to look at trading in bitcoin futures | Computer chip flaws present new security problem | Zuckerberg vows to improve Facebook in 2018 MORE (R-Ohio), a former U.S. Trade Representative who faces a tough reelection campaign, said Thursday that he “cannot support the TPP in its current form because it doesn’t provide that level playing field.” 

Portman’s opposition is perhaps the best symbol yet of the difficulty faced by trade supporters. That a former U.S. trade representative is opposing the deal speaks volumes to the perceived dangers of tackling the issue this year.

Kevin Madden, a former adviser to Republican presidential campaigns, is urging pro-TPP candidates to get out front and tout the economic and national security benefits of the deal in an effort to better navigate any potential congressional complications. 

“In this environment right now we’re combating the anti-trade talk with the facts,” he said.