Healthcare Roundup: One step closer to medical-loss ratio rules

“These ads are smearing the records of people who stood up to the insurance companies and ended the worst abuses of consumers,” HCAN Executive Director Ethan Rome said in a statement. “The health care law improves health care for families, seniors and businesses.

The phone campaign, Rome said, "is about warning people they shouldn’t be fooled by the onslaught of insurance company-sponsored propaganda.”

Goal to reach 500,000 seniors in 10 states

The group is making calls in support of Sens. Harry ReidHarry ReidGrassley accuses Reid of 'pure unfiltered partisanship' Overnight Defense: Congress overrides Obama 9/11 veto | Pentagon breathes easy after funding deal | More troops heading to Iraq 78 lawmakers vote to sustain Obama veto MORE (Nev.), Barbara BoxerBarbara BoxerDems gain upper hand on budget Overnight Finance: Senate rejects funding bill as shutdown looms | Labor Dept. to probe Wells Fargo | Fed to ease stress test rules for small banks Funding bill rejected as shutdown nears MORE (Calif.), Russ Feingold (Wis.) and Senate candidate Joe Sestak (Pa.). 

On the House side, HCAN is targeting districts represented by Illinois Reps. Melissa Bean, Bill FosterBill FosterDiversity of House GOP at risk in 2016 election Lawmakers celebrate Jackie Robinson Day Overnight Energy: Fight breaks out over Interior budget MORE and Deborah Halvorson; Michigan Reps. Mark Schauer and Gary Peters; New York Reps. Scott Murphy, Bill Owens and Daniel Maffei; Ohio Reps. John Boccieri and Mary Jo Kilroy; Pennsylvania Reps. Chris Carney, Kathy Dahlkemper, Paul Kanjorski and Patrick Murphy; and Florida Reps. Suzanne Kosmas and Alan GraysonAlan GraysonTrump campaign's taco truck gaffe underscores Latinos' political power Dem polling shows Rubio in a dead heat Canova refuses to congratulate Wasserman Schultz on victory MORE.

Included as well are districts represented by Reps. Dina Titus (Nev.), Steve Kagen (Wis.) and Tom Perriello (Va.).

Grassley wants HHS to investigate high-prescribing docs

Sen. Chuck GrassleyChuck GrassleySenate passes bill to preserve sexual assault kits Grassley accuses Reid of 'pure unfiltered partisanship' Overnight Healthcare: Zika funding nears finish line | House expected to approve spending bill tonight | New pledge to push medical cures bill MORE, ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, urged HHS on Wednesday to launch an investigation into doctors with itchy prescription fingers. 

The Iowa Republican says his own inquiry into the subject turned up:

• A Miami physician who wrote nearly 97,000 prescriptions for mental-health drugs for Medicaid patients — in less than two years; 

• An Ohio doctor who wrote 102,000 prescriptions in two years; 

• And a Texas doctor who, last year alone, wrote 14,170 prescriptions for Xanax.

"The federal government has an obligation to figure out what's going on here," Grassley said in a statement. "The taxpayers are footing the bill, and Medicare and Medicaid are already strained to the limit.  

"These programs can't spare a dollar for prescription drugs that aren't properly prescribed. The conclusion might be that there isn't any fraud, but it's important to reach a conclusion one way or the other and fix whatever is broken."

Former senators promote malpractice courts as balanced-budget solution

Over the summer, Esquire magazine put together a committee of former lawmakers to come up with ways to fix the country's spending crisis. On Thursday, former Sens. Bill Bradley, Gary Hart, John Danforth and Bob Packwood announced one element of their plan: the creation of medical malpractice courts.

"As an alternative to the current trial-by-jury system for medical-malpractice lawsuits, this proposal would decrease the number of frivolous lawsuits that reach trial, increase the speed with which meritorious lawsuits reach trial, and reduce administrative costs for the federal judiciary," the group said in a statement. 

"It would also discourage the practice of defensive medicine, whereby health-care providers, under the constant threat of litigation, often order unnecessary (and costly) tests and procedures to hedge against potential lawsuits."

A longer version of the recommendation appears in the November issue of Esquire.

Food fight!

Congress might be focused on November's midterms, but food safety advocates haven't forgotten about that amendment to the Democrats' food safety bill that would exempt small farmers from the new restrictions. http://bit.ly/cjGEpy

In a Thursday letter to Senate lawmakers, the Make Our Food Safe coalition is urging lawmakers to reject the amendment, which is sponsored by Sens. Jon TesterJon TesterDemocrats press Wells Fargo CEO for more answers on scandal Overnight Finance: Senate rejects funding bill as shutdown looms | Labor Dept. to probe Wells Fargo | Fed to ease stress test rules for small banks Overnight Energy: Judges scrutinize Obama climate rule MORE (D-Mont.) and Kay HaganKay HaganPhoto finish predicted for Trump, Clinton in North Carolina Are Senate Republicans facing an election wipeout? Clinton's lead in NC elevates Senate race MORE (D-N.C.). Carving out small farmers, the advocates say, ignores "the risk to human health posed by a particular food item." 

"As a result, high-risk foods would be exempt from safety regulations."

Not to be outdone, the small-farmers lobby weighed in as well. 

"Our strong hope is once [critics] look at the actual details of the amendment they will change their position," Ferd Hoefner, policy director of the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition, said in a statement. 

"The sooner they remove this damaging new roadblock to passage of the Food Safety Modernization Act in the short time left in this session of Congress the better."