The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that children would make up roughly two-thirds of the people who would lose coverage if the MOE requirements are repealed. States could drop as many as 1.7 million beneficiaries from the Children’s Health Insurance Program in 2016, CBO said.
Similarly, elderly Medicaid beneficiaries who also receive Medicare benefits are an especially costly group. Many opponents of the MOE repeal say states would likely turn to those patients for the biggest savings.
Subcommittee Republicans emphasized that the bill doesn’t tell states where to make cuts, or even require them to make any. But with many states facing budget caps, they said, governors need flexibility to find some savings in Medicaid, rather than keeping coverage at its current levels and cutting more deeply into other programs.
Democrats’ amendments tried to “tug at the heartstrings of the American public,” but the coverage requirements are “tugging at the purse strings” of state governments, said Rep. Phil GingreyPhil GingreyBeating the drum on healthcare Former GOP chairman joins K Street Former Rep. Gingrey lands on K Street MORE (R-Ga.), the bill’s lead sponsor.
Although all of the Democrats who attended Thursday’s markup voted against the MOE bill, Medicaid advocates worry that opposition might be stifled by the stronger emphasis on Republican proposals to convert federal Medicaid funding to block grants. And Medicaid in general is less of a political lightning rod than Medicare, to which House Republicans have also proposed drastic changes.
Tags Phil Gingrey