By Julian Pecquet - 06/16/11 05:34 PM EDT
They also point out that so-called direct care workers are expected to reach 4.3 million people by 2018, more than all law enforcement officials or K-12 teachers. At the same time, America's aging population could be more efficiently cared for in their homes rather than in costly nursing homes or assisted living facilities.
The bill is expected to cost the federal government money because Medicaid covers most home care services. While the bill doesn't require Medicaid to increase its reimbursements to providers, that's still likely to happen as providers face higher costs and seek better reimbursements.
The bill's defenders however counter that paying home care workers higher wages would also save money. It would reduce the industry's high turnover rate. One study estimated a $2.5 billion "hidden tax of turnover" that leads to higher rates of hospitalization and involuntary institutionalization due to interrupted care, while also slashing welfare spending (nearly half of home care workers are eligible for food stamps).
The federal regulations, meanwhile, are expected to resemble regulations President Bill ClintonBill ClintonTrump: 'I'm considering' going after Clintons' marriage What Trump and Obama have in common Trump demands Obama not pardon Clinton for 'crimes' MORE promulgated at the end of his second term. President George W. Bush retracted them at the start of his administration.
The Department of Labor is expected to overturn the home care worker exemption later this year, but advocates point out that legislation is still needed because the regulation will likely be tied up in the courts for years if home care businesses sue.