The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is pushing back hard on industry's campaign against proposed voluntary restrictions on food marketing to children.
The commission, one of four government agencies tasked with drawing up the guidelines, lambasted industry critics who suggest the anti-obesity proposal is a backdoor effort to regulate commercial speech. In a sharply worded 12-point rebuttal, the FTC said the proposal "doesn't ban any marketing or any foods at all."
"Frankly, these folks might want to switch to decaf."
The retort comes after the U.S. Chamber of Commerce on Thursday assailed the guidelines through a panel of experts. Their criticisms, The Hill reported Thursday, range from allegations that the guidelines would violate the First Amendment to questions about their efficiency.
Despite being voluntary, said Northwestern University law Professor Martin Redish, the guidelines could have a chilling effect on commercial speech for several reasons, including regulators' control over the food industry; reputational damage for companies that don't comply; pressure on media outlets not to carry the advertising; and the heightened risk of class-action lawsuits.
The FTC said those concerns were all "myths."
"A report is not a law, a regulation or an order, and it can’t be enforced," Vladeck wrote. "While we hope companies voluntarily choose to adopt the principles (when finalized), there's no legal consequence if they don't. So there's no effect on their free speech rights."
Businesses, parents, consumer groups and others have until July 14 to comment on the proposal.