"While decades of science clearly show that these practices breed drug-resistant bacteria that can infect us, we need to know more about the scope of the problem."
The Antimicrobial Data Collection Act is a boon to health advocates who say the federal government should do more to cut the use of antibiotics in livestock.
The practice contributes to drug-resistant disease, which clinicians consider a looming public health crisis.
Sens. Kirsten GillibrandKirsten GillibrandGOP chairman: Spending bill expected to last through April Vet groups applaud Trump's Defense pick of Mattis Dem lawmaker won't support waiver allowing Mattis to serve as defense secretary MORE (D-N.Y.), Dianne FeinsteinDianne FeinsteinCongress strikes deal on water bill with Flint aid Top Dem signals likely opposition to Sessions nomination Senator blasts GOP push for California drought language in water bill MORE (D-Calif.) and Susan CollinsSusan CollinsSenators crafting bill to limit deportations under Trump Cornyn: ‘Virtual certainty’ Sessions and Price will be confirmed Trump's wrong to pick Bannon or Sessions for anything MORE (R-Maine) introduced the bill on Wednesday.
It would require the FDA to establish a pilot program to find new data sources on antibiotic use in livestock, in addition to setting new standards for how federal officials publish that data.
The bill would also set a deadline for the FDA to finalize policies meant to curb the use of antibiotics in agriculture.
"Our bill would not create any new reporting requirements for drug companies, feed mills, or farmers," said Collins in a statement.
"It would only require the FDA to provide more transparency in reporting the antimicrobial data which is already being reported to it."