Two Republican senators say they’ll introduce legislation to reverse the Obama administration’s rule change allowing the federal government to contribute to Capitol Hill employee health insurance premiums.
Republicans have argued the rule change amounts to a “bailout” from ObamaCare for a favored congressional class.
Sens. David VitterDavid VitterMercury brings on former Sen. Vitter, two others Lobbying World Bottom Line MORE (La.) and Mike EnziMike EnziLawmakers fundraise amid rising town hall pressure A guide to the committees: Senate GOP senators unveil bill to give Congress control of consumer bureau budget MORE (Wyo.) said they would offer legislation in September to reverse and modify the rule change.
The federal government, like many large-scale employees, now subsidizes premium costs for congressional employees. In the government’s case, the subsidy can amount to as much as 75 percent of the premium’s cost.
The ObamaCare law was silent on whether these subsidies could continue, but under a rule issued in August by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), the federal government could continue to offer subsidies for premiums to lawmakers and congressional staff.
The rule allows each member of Congress to determine whether his or her staffers will get help from the government to cover their premiums.
Vitter and Enzi said their bill would change the law so that lawmakers would not have this authority. As a result, staff would have to buy insurance on their own, without help from their employers.
It would also go further by making the president, vice president and political appointees also ineligible for the Federal Employees Health Benefits Plan. Those officials would be required to purchase their own insurance without taxpayer dollars.
“These recent maneuverings inside the Beltway are precisely why the American people rightly despise Congress,” Vitter said. “Our legislation gets right to the core of the OPM “fix” for Washington.”
Rep. Ron DeSantis, (R-Fla.) announced similar legislation yesterday for the House to take up.
Those who support the rule change argue it is appropriate for the federal government to continue to offer premium support to employees, just as many other large employers are expected do under ObamaCare.