Senate Democrats will try to resurrect a United Nations treaty on rights for the disabled that was rejected last year over GOP concerns it would imperil home-schooling.
The treaty fell five votes short of the necessary two-thirds majority in a 61-38 vote in December after former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Penn.) led a charge that it would give unelected UN bureaucrats the power to challenge U.S. home-schooling.
Menendez hopes to strike a deal on a way forward with the panel's top Republican, Sen. Bob CorkerBob CorkerA guide to the committees: Senate Republicans play clean up on Trump's foreign policy GOP Congress unnerved by Trump bumps MORE of Tennessee, who voted against the treaty last year.
While last year’s vote took place after the presidential election, advocates believe the debate got tied up in election-year politics and that a revote this session could be successful.
The treaty would extend the protections of the Americans with Disabilities Act to people with disabilities around the world, including Americans living abroad, according to advocates.
“We believe very much there is a path forward for victory,” said Marca Bristo, president of the U.S. International Council on Disabilities. “If we didn't, we wouldn't be putting in this effort.”
Opponents have long warned that it may come back up. Last month, the Home School Legal Defense Association jumped the gun and sent out an action alert to its members warning – inaccurately – that Menendez's panel had scheduled a hearing for June 4.
“Thank you for joining us in this battle to protect our children and our children’s future,” wrote association president J. Michael Smith. “You defeated this treaty last year. Standing together, we can defeat this treaty once again.”
The treaty's path to ratification remains a challenging one.
Although Democrats gained two seats in the 2012 elections, only three of last year's “no” votes were replaced – all of them by fellow Republicans: Sens. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.), Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) and Kay Bailey Hutchinson (R-Texas) have given way to Sens. Jeff FlakeJeff FlakeFCC's GOP chairman blocks Internet privacy rule Greens launch ads against two GOP senators for Pruitt votes GOP groups ramp up pressure on lawmakers over ObamaCare MORE, Tim ScottTim ScottGOP rep: No ‘artificial crowd’ at my town hall A guide to the committees: Senate Republicans at risk in 2018 steering clear of town halls MORE and Ted CruzTed CruzBrietbart CEO reveals that Trump donors are part owners At CPAC, Trump lashes out at media Conquering Trump returns to conservative summit MORE.
And Democrats have since lost Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.), whose seat is being temporarily filled by Jeffrey Chiesa, a Republican, until a special election in October.
But Advocates say the situation has changed in their favor.
Bristo said several lawmakers opposed the treaty in part because the vote was held during the lame-duck session, after the voters had cast their ballots for new lawmakers to make decisions on their behalf. And, she said, Democrat may allow amendments to address remaining issues for Republicans who are on the fence.
“There's a variety of senators out there who we think if they stand by what they said are very gettable,” she said.
She's also “very positive” Sen. Mark KirkMark KirkLeaked ObamaCare bill would defund Planned Parenthood GOP senator won't vote to defund Planned Parenthood The Hill's 12:30 Report MORE will join the “yes” column after being sidelined all last year because of a stroke.
In addition, Sen. Johnny IsaksonJohnny IsaksonA guide to the committees: Senate GOP rep on Trump: 'God has used imperfect people to do great things before' GOP senators unveil bill to give Congress control of consumer bureau budget MORE (R-Ga.) had voted for the treaty in committee before voting "no" on the floor.
Treaty advocates say they have one more factor in their favor: Recent reversals on conservative social issues that have Republicans worried about their party's appeal.
The Supreme Court's ruling in favor of gay marriage and the Senate's passage of immigration reform – both issues that polls show have the support of a majority of Americans – may persuade some Republicans that voting against a treaty that has the support of a broad swath of people with disabilities of all political stripes is not in their best interest.
“There comes a point when a lot of these galvanizing issues with a social component, when you're on the wrong side of too many of them it has an effect,” the Democratic aide said. “You have voices within [the Republican] Caucus making the case that 'we need to get our act together'.”
Please send tips and comments to Julian Pecquet: email@example.com