By Rebecca Shabad - 09/05/13 04:23 PM EDT
He said he doesn’t think the president’s options will accomplish the goal of deterring chemical weapons attacks.
“It remains unclear how the president’s plan to execute limited strikes would prevent Assad from using chemical weapons again or even make it less likely,” he said. “Second, it is entirely possible that ineffective U.S. strikes would embolden Assad to become even more ruthless towards his people.”
This is the first official full statement the Utah senator has made regarding Syria since the Obama administration began to voice its intentions to attack.
He tweeted twice about Syria on Friday after Secretary of State John KerryJohn KerryKremlin: DNC hack claim 'absurd' Pelosi: 'No question' that Russia hacked DNC Kerry: Details on agreement with Russia in Syria could come in August MORE made the case for an intervention.
If the president can't convince Congress that #Syria crisis threatens our national security, military intervention should be off the table.— Mike LeeMike LeeObama signs opioid bill Thiel said to explain support for Trump in convention speech Convention erupts at Cruz snub MORE (@SenMikeLee) August 30, 2013