By Rebecca Shabad - 09/05/13 04:23 PM EDT
He said he doesn’t think the president’s options will accomplish the goal of deterring chemical weapons attacks.
“It remains unclear how the president’s plan to execute limited strikes would prevent Assad from using chemical weapons again or even make it less likely,” he said. “Second, it is entirely possible that ineffective U.S. strikes would embolden Assad to become even more ruthless towards his people.”
This is the first official full statement the Utah senator has made regarding Syria since the Obama administration began to voice its intentions to attack.
He tweeted twice about Syria on Friday after Secretary of State John KerryJohn KerryAn all-female ticket? Not in 2016 GOP senator calls for China to crack down on illegal opioid Obamas to live in home of former Clinton press secretary: report MORE made the case for an intervention.
If the president can't convince Congress that #Syria crisis threatens our national security, military intervention should be off the table.— Mike LeeMike LeeMeet the billionaire donor behind Hulk Hogan’s lawsuit against Gawker Overnight Cybersecurity: Guccifer plea deal raises questions in Clinton probe Senate panel delays email privacy vote amid concerns MORE (@SenMikeLee) August 30, 2013