He said he doesn’t think the president’s options will accomplish the goal of deterring chemical weapons attacks.
“It remains unclear how the president’s plan to execute limited strikes would prevent Assad from using chemical weapons again or even make it less likely,” he said. “Second, it is entirely possible that ineffective U.S. strikes would embolden Assad to become even more ruthless towards his people.”
This is the first official full statement the Utah senator has made regarding Syria since the Obama administration began to voice its intentions to attack.
He tweeted twice about Syria on Friday after Secretary of State John KerryJohn KerryNew York Knicks owner gave 0K to pro-Trump group A bold, common sense UN move for the Trump administration Former Obama officials say Netanyahu turned down secret peace deal: AP MORE made the case for an intervention.
If the president can't convince Congress that #Syria crisis threatens our national security, military intervention should be off the table.— Mike LeeMike LeeLessons from the godfather of regulatory budgeting Congress must reform civil asset forfeiture laws A guide to the committees: Senate MORE (@SenMikeLee) August 30, 2013