Ban has repeatedly called for Assad to be held to account if the allegations are proven true, but only through U.N. action.
“I have repeatedly stressed that any use of chemical weapons by anyone under any circumstance would be a serious violation of international law and an outrageous crime,” he said Thursday at the G-20. “We cannot allow impunity in any crime against humanity.
“I believe that the topic of chemical weapons is critically important for international peace and security, and I take note of the ongoing debate over what course of action should be taken by the international community. All those actions should be taken within the framework of the UN Charter, as a matter of principle.”
The Obama administration argues that the United States is justified in acting, even alone, because the U.N. is hopelessly stuck.
“On occasion, as we had with Kosovo ... we cannot allow the patron of a party to the conflict, the patron of the actor that itself violated this international norm, to act with impunity simply because it has that patronage on the Security Council,” U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Samantha PowerSamantha PowerHow will history judge Obama’s actions in Syria? Russia's ambassador to the United Nations dies Trump's top diplomat enters pressure cooker MORE said Thursday. “That in no way reflects the spirit of the UN charter or the intentions of the founders or the intentions of any of us who come to work every day with the hope of promoting and enforcing international peace and security.
“In this case, with regard to this mass casualty chemical weapons use and the risk of further use, the risk, as the Secretary General said, of this becoming a weapon of war, to stand back would be to endanger not only international peace and security, not only U.S. national security, but we also believe the very international system that we have been working these decades to build.”
Please send tips and comments to Julian Pecquet: firstname.lastname@example.org