“The administration's policy is totally something else,” Isakson said.
Menendez urged Republicans to clear the nominees quickly at a time of rising threats.
“What I would say to members of the committee is that – at the end of the day – we may disagree on verification and compliance procedures, but we cannot disagree on the significance of the threats we face and the need to have a team in place tasked with representing our security interests at the highest levels,” he said in his opening remarks. “This is not the time to say 'no' to confirming qualified, experienced non-proliferation experts when so much is at stake in Syria, Iran, North Korea, and in negotiations with Russia – not when we imagine the consequences of the spread of these weapons.”
Sen. Marco RubioMarco RubioOvernight Defense: Commander calls North Korea crisis 'worst' he's seen | Trump signs VA order | Dems push Trump to fill national security posts What’s with Trump’s spelling mistakes? Boeing must be stopped from doing business with Iran MORE (R-Fla.) pressed Gottemoeller during the hearing to rule out any further reductions outside a formal treaty, but she would not get pinned down, saying only that unilateral cuts are “not on the table.” And Sen. John BarrassoJohn BarrassoPoll: Sanders most popular senator in the US The animal advocate Trump climate move risks unraveling Paris commitments MORE (R-Wyo.) pressed Gottemoeller on whether she supported Secretary of State John KerryJohn KerryEgypt’s death squads and America's deafening silence With help from US, transformative change in Iran is within reach Ellison comments on Obama criticized as 'a stupid thing to say' MORE's decision to sign the NRA-opposed arms trade treaty Wednesday at the U.N.
“We were all very keen to see the treaty signed,” she said, adding that it had “nothing to do with our own domestic arrangements” but only affects weapons exports.
Please send tips and comments to Julian Pecquet: email@example.com