A Senate Republican is predicting opponents of the Iran nuclear deal won't be able to overcome a veto by President Obama of a resolution disapproving the accord.
"I still believe that the president will have enough votes to sustain a veto," Sen. Jeff FlakeJeff FlakeOvernight Tech: GOP chairman to propose high-skilled visa overhaul | Zuckerberg's 5,700 word letter | Tech lobbies gear up ahead of internet fight Senate Dem blasts GOP for trying to repeal broadband privacy rules Planned Parenthood targets GOP lawmakers amid ObamaCare protests MORE (R-Ariz.) told the The Arizona Republic in an interview published over the weekend.
While a resolution of disapproval will surely pass the House and could win the 60 votes necessary to overcome a filibuster in the Senate, winning the two-thirds majority in each chamber to overcome veto looks difficult. If all Republicans vote to kill the deal, they will need to peel off 13 Democrats in the Senate and 44 in the House to override a veto.
On Monday, Flake’s fellow Arizonan, Sen. John McCain (R), appeared confident that the Senate would be able to overcome a filibuster, but he was less sure about overriding a veto.
Lobbying on the Iran deal has stayed as hot as ever during the August recess.
“I’m getting a lot of calls," Flake told The Republic. "There are calls and e-mails to the office and calls personally from people who just want to know where I am.
"My concern has been that we are, with this agreement, giving up some of the tools that we have used in the past or could use in the future to deter or punish that kind of behavior," he added.
In particular, he has said he wants to make sure that the U.S. can still impose penalties on Iran for other behaviors, such as human rights abuses and support for global terrorism.
"The administration says, no, we're not giving up our ability, for example, to impose sanctions,” he said. “But if you read the agreement, it seems to indicate otherwise, and the Iranians certainly believe otherwise, and have said so."