Patent reform bills should provide companies with a way challenge overly-board, harmful patents, a group of trade associations from various industries said in letters to the Chairmen and ranking members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees.
The group of trade associations — ranging from tech groups to the American Gaming Association, the National Grocers Association and the American Hotel and Lodging Association — said in the letter that companies being sued by patent trolls should be able to challenge those patents at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Under current law, companies being sued for patent infringement can ask the Patent Office to reevaluate a patent if it is related to a financial service. Patent reform advocates have pushed for that review process to be available for software patents as well.
House Judiciary Chairman Bob GoodlatteBob GoodlatteLawmakers reintroduce online sales tax bills Senators push 'cost-effective' reg reform Rob Thomas: Anti-Trump celebs have become 'white noise' MORE (R-Va.) recently introduced a patent reform bill with what many consider to be a small expansion of the patent review process, and Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick LeahyPatrick LeahyHollywood, DC come together for First Amendment-themed VIP party The Hill's 12:30 Report Lawmakers talk climate for Earth Day, Science March MORE is expected to release his patent reform bill in the coming weeks.
While patents can be challenged in the course of a lawsuit, allowing companies to challenge patents at the Patent Office would give “threatened companies a substantially less expensive way to challenge low quality patents,” the letter said.
Trying to prove that an overly-broad patent is “invalid through litigation can take years and cost millions.”
“Other programs for challenging patent validity at the PTO do not allow the PTO to consider whether the patent is abstract, vague, or too broad, common problems with the business method patents asserted by” patent trolls, the groups wrote.