The cable industry, rural telecom firms and other competitors have all argued the ABC plan heavily favors incumbent telecom providers rather than opening the competition to alternative technologies. The carriers have countered that the quickest route to expanding service is to trust those firms already in place.
The letter argues the FCC plan is inconsistent with the administration's commitment to reducing regulatory barriers for small businesses to boost job creation. They accuse the agency of pursuing its own agenda instead of working to assure all rural consumers have access to broadband.
Because of political pressure to both limit the size of the high-cost fund and prevent increases in the monthly fee consumers pay on their phone bill to fund the USF, there has been speculation the FCC plan will ultimately fall short of guaranteeing universal broadband service.
For evidence, some point to the fact the FCC is planning to rename the subsidy program as part of the changes, eliminating the term "universal service," which was closely associated with the nation's commitment to ensuring all consumers have access to home phone service.