Thirty-eight privacy and tech groups are warning Senate leadership that they will oppose a Senate reform bill if it doesn’t go far enough to end sweeping surveillance programs at the National Security Agency (NSA).
Signatories include the American Civil Liberties Union, Reddit, the Center for Democracy and Technology, Access and the New America Foundation’s Open Technology Institute.
The letter comes as the Senate takes up the USA Freedom Act — a bill to end the NSA’s “bulk” surveillance programs and make other changes within the intelligence community — that was introduced by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick LeahyPatrick LeahySenate confirms first nominees of Trump era Senate gears up for battle over Trump's CIA pick Overnight Tech: Meet the key players for Trump on tech | Patent chief staying on | Kerry aide goes to Snapchat | Uber's M settlement MORE (D-Vt.) and Patriot Act author Rep. Jim SensenbrennerJames SensenbrennerHouse group seeks alternatives on encryption fight Congress should learn from states on civil asset forfeiture GOP rep presses Trump to meet with Dalai Lama MORE (R-Wis.) last year.
In May, the House passed a compromise version of the bill.
While privacy advocacy groups initially supported the bill, they withdrew their support as the bill headed to the House floor, saying it had been “watered down” through eleventh-hour negotiations with the administration and House leadership.
In their Wednesday letter, the groups warn the Senate not to follow the House’s example and threaten to oppose a weak reform bill.
The groups asked that the Senate NSA reform bill, among other things, “definitively end ‘bulk’ collection,” increase transparency around U.S. surveillance and reform the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which approves government surveillance requests.
“We believe that strong legislation can effectively address our concerns and we are committed to supporting Congress in passing such legislation,” the letter said, “but we will be forced to oppose any bill that is not a substantial improvement over the version of the USA Freedom Act that was passed in the House.”