Apple made an aggressive pitch for a corporate tax holiday Monday, stressing that it plans to keep more than $60 billion parked offshore until Congress makes it easier for companies to bring those profits home.
The warning from the nation’s most valuable company came as Apple announced it would pay a dividend to shareholders and buy back stock, moves that will cost about $45 billion over three years.
"Repatriating the cash from offshore would result in significant tax consequences under current U.S. law," Apple Chief Financial Officer Peter Oppenheimer said on a conference call.
Apple and other backers of a repatriation holiday — including Oracle, Cisco, Microsoft and Google — threw their support last year behind the WIN America Campaign, a lobbying coalition that urged Congress to temporarily reduce the tax rate that U.S. multinationals have to pay on offshore profits.
As it stands, companies have to pay their full corporate rate, as high as 35 percent, on profits made anywhere in the world. The corporations can defer paying those taxes until the profits are brought to the United States, and also receive credits for taxes paid to foreign governments.
Supporters of a tax holiday say that U.S. companies have, according to some estimates, more than $1 trillion held abroad, and that making it easier to repatriate those funds could quickly inject cash into the U.S. economy.
Under repatriation measures introduced in both chambers of Congress, multinationals could potentially pay a tax rate as low as 5.25 percent on offshore profits.
But while those proposals have supporters in both parties, the measures have powerful opponents and have yet to move far in Congress. Skeptics of the holiday point to several reports that have said a previous tax holiday, enacted in 2004, did little to stimulate job creation.
The Obama administration, which released a corporate tax reform framework last month, is among those that feel the last holiday did little to help the economy. Administration officials have for months said they are firmly opposed to a repatriation holiday, and that they would not consider the idea outside of the broader context of tax reform.
“I think generally we're pretty clear that we're opposed to a repatriation holiday, that the evidence with the previous one indicated that lots of the resources were used for stock buyback, dividend payments and so on,” a senior administration official said last month.
Rep. Dave Camp (R-Mich.), the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, included a repatriation provision in a draft tax reform proposal last year that would permanently limit U.S. taxation of offshore profits.
But Camp, along with House Speaker John BoehnerJohn BoehnerLobbying World 'Ready for Michelle' PACs urge 2020 run News Flash: Trump was never going to lock Clinton up MORE (R-Ohio), also disagreed with House Majority Leader Eric CantorEric CantorChamber of Commerce overhauls lobbying operation Laura Ingraham under consideration for White House press secretary VA Dems jockey for Kaine's seat MORE (R-Va.) late last year over whether to include a repatriation holiday into the House GOP’s payroll tax deal. The three Republicans all support repatriation, but have not always been on the same page over whether to push for a holiday or include repatriation as part of a wider tax reform agreement.
Once repatriation failed to make the year-end tax deal, many Washington tax observers felt it faced long odds this year, given that 2012 is an election year and some top lawmakers are preparing a push for tax reform in 2013.
But the comments from Apple indicate that the lobbying efforts for a holiday could soon be ramped up again, and some on K Street have said supporters can use the argument that the company might have made even larger dividend payments under a repatriation holiday.
"We have expressed our views with Congress and the administration. We think that the current tax laws provide a considerable economic disincentive to U.S. companies that might otherwise repatriate the substantial amount of foreign cash that they have," Oppenheimer said. "That's our view, and we've expressed it."
But other tax lobbyists have said they are skeptical that taxes played that much of a role in the size of Apple’s dividend payments — with one saying that the tech giant had been “politically tone deaf” in making the argument that it needed a tax holiday on the same day it announced a roughly $45 billion investment.
“The compelling argument is: We need this money,” the lobbyist said. “Well, they sure make it seem like they don't.”
— This story was first posted at 1:58 p.m. and has been updated.