By Mario Trujillo - 01/27/15 04:48 PM EST
Two Republican senators are hoping to shine a spotlight on the Commerce Department’s moves to hand off oversight of the system governing Internet addresses.
GOP Sens. Orrin HatchOrrin HatchInternet companies dominate tech lobbying Senate panel approves pension rescue for coal miners Overnight Tech: GOP says internet fight isn't over | EU chief defends Apple tax ruling | Feds roll out self-driving car guidelines | Netflix's China worries MORE (Utah) and Roy BluntRoy BluntSenate rivals gear up for debates Super PAC hits Dem Senate candidate with ad in tightening Missouri race The Trail 2016: Presidential politics and policing MORE (Mo.) introduced a resolution Tuesday that would designate the week of Feb. 8 as Internet Governance Awareness Week, which would coincide with a meeting in Singapore on the topic.
Last March, the Commerce Department announced it would be handing off its oversight and management of the Internet domain name system, which allows Internet users to easily search for websites using unique addresses. Some Republicans and other critics have cautioned against the plan.
Some have worried that the process could allow repressive governments to assert broader control or that governance could be left in the hands of “unaccountable bureaucrats.”
The resolution introduced Tuesday outlines a series of principles for ICANN to follow as it organizes the multi-stakeholder process.
The Commerce Department has repeatedly said any proposal must maintain an open Internet and that it would not accept a government-led solution. The department had hoped for a September target date for the transition because that is when its current contract expires with ICANN. But that can be extended for up to four years.
Last December, Congress approved a spending bill that included a provision that prohibited the department from using funds for the transition during this fiscal year.
Lawrence Strickling, an assistant secretary for the department, said Tuesday the department will not make the transition before the contract expires due to the legislation, and it takes the congressional action “seriously.” But he said the legislation does not bar other stakeholders from developing a transition plan. He said the department would actively monitor those discussions.